Mark, Would it still be possible to extend the "Link Relation Type registry" [1] with a rel="meta" value? Use case would be ACLs as described in [2] (see section 3.2). If this is not possible, what rel value would you advise to use, instead? Cheers, Michael [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08#section-6.2 [2] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2009/Papers/ISWC/rdf-access-control/paper.pdf -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html > From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@pobox.com> > Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:39:49 +1100 > To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> > Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification - > draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt > Resent-From: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:40:36 +0000 > > FYI. > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Internet-Draft@ietf.org >> Date: 2 March 2010 12:00:01 AM AEDT >> To: mnot@pobox.com, >> draft-nottingham-http-link-header@tools.ietf.org,lisa.dusseault@gmail.com >> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt >> >> New version (-08) has been submitted for >> draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt. >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt >> >> >> Diff from previous version: >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08 >> >> IETF Secretariat. > >Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 16:00:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:21 UTC