rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt)

Mark,

Would it still be possible to extend the "Link Relation Type registry" [1]
with a rel="meta" value? Use case would be ACLs as described in [2] (see
section 3.2). If this is not possible, what rel value would you advise to
use, instead?

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08#section-6.2
[2] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2009/Papers/ISWC/rdf-access-control/paper.pdf

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@pobox.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:39:49 +1100
> To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification -
> draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt
> Resent-From: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:40:36 +0000
> 
> FYI.
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Internet-Draft@ietf.org
>> Date: 2 March 2010 12:00:01 AM AEDT
>> To: mnot@pobox.com,
>> draft-nottingham-http-link-header@tools.ietf.org,lisa.dusseault@gmail.com
>> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt
>> 
>> New version (-08) has been submitted for
>> draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt.
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt
>> 
>> 
>> Diff from previous version:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08
>> 
>> IETF Secretariat.
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 16:00:09 UTC