Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation

On Mar 3, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Note:
> 
>   If a header field is absent from a request, it can only match another
>   request if it is also absent there.
> 
> Is that still true? I don't think; maybe we can remove the sentence completely?

Yes, it is still true.

   Accept:

means accept nothing (give me a 300 instead).  No Accept header means
accept everything.

....Roy