On 23.03.2010 02:48, Dan Winship wrote: > On 03/22/2010 08:49 PM, Mahdavi, Jamshid wrote: >> We could try to clarify this by adding an implementation note to the >> text. Alternately, since some servers actually do implement *just* the >> 1951 version, we could add another content-coding which is >> specifically for this. > > My understanding is that the "bare" version is actually more common on > the web than the correct version, due to the fact that at least IE6 and > IE7 (not sure about 8 and 9) only support the bare version, and most > other browsers support both. Sounds like it would be cool to have test cases... > ... BR, JulianReceived on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:19:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:21 UTC