Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age

On 17.03.2010 10:57, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Looks good to me.
> ...

OK, applied with <>.

Question: is this a Change from RFC2616 we need to mention? I'm not 
sure, as I don't think there is a normative requirement to use excatly 
this method for Age Calculation.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2010 10:14:41 UTC