Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age

I think it'd be worthwhile to point it out. 


On 17/03/2010, at 9:13 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 17.03.2010 10:57, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Looks good to me.
>> ...
> 
> OK, applied with <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/792>.
> 
> Question: is this a Change from RFC2616 we need to mention? I'm not sure, as I don't think there is a normative requirement to use excatly this method for Age Calculation.
> 
> Best regards, Julian


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Thursday, 18 March 2010 23:56:27 UTC