- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:34:11 +0100
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:25:46 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> Well, I don't really see the drawback in allowing more bytes by default. > > ...by default in what? The generic value production. >> It seems that you always need a specific parser at some point except >> for headers that take fixed token values, but for those being more >> lenient > > so let's s/parser/parser component/ Sure. >> is not an issue. Therefore I was wondering whether a concept of generic >> parser is even used/needed in implementations today. Or maybe they have >> such a concept, but it already is far more lenient so it can also cope >> with e.g. Link and Cookie-related headers. And maybe Authorization? And > > You tell me. What does Opera do here? Yngve is in a better position to answer that I think. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 5 February 2010 16:34:51 UTC