On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:52:42 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> >> I can't say that I agree with that reasoning. IMHO interoperability >> going forward is more important than not declaring currently >> conforming implementations non-conforming. If anyone gets really sad >> for loosing their conforming badge, I can send them some home made >> cookies ;) > > Yes please! :-) If updating the spec to use MUST requirements here makes you sad, please do send me the address of the Opera HQ and I guess I'll send the cookies. I do reserve the right to blog about an apparent change in Operas attitude towards making specs have strict requirements though ;) All under the condition that Julian changes the spec of course. / JonasReceived on Friday, 12 March 2010 22:22:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:21 UTC