On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/05/2010 10:59 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> Don't many headers accept more bytes there? E.g. cookie related headers. >> >> Indeed, Cookies (as specced in RFC 2109) use that pattern as well. > > RFC 2109 isn't used though. Set-Cookie and Cookie are complete > disasters, syntax-wise, and are almost certainly treated as > special-cases even by clients that otherwise use a generic parser. Yeah, I wouldn't use the Set-Cookie header as a syntactic model for anything. :) AdamReceived on Friday, 5 February 2010 21:54:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:21 UTC