Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet?

On 2010-03 -15, at 08:49, Nathan wrote:

> Hi Martin,
> 
> I'm actually having a full back track on my thought..
> 
> If a resource is anything that can be named, then I have it's name / can
> describe what it is, so I should stop being lazy and at least give what
> tiny bit of information I know (even if just the name).
> 
> The above may have been the solution I needed all along (gulp)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Nathan
> 

Sounds like an excellent idea.

<#foo> rdfs:comment "Information about this will be available shortly  --Nathan".

in N3 for example.

Tim

Received on Monday, 15 March 2010 11:06:37 UTC