On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Jonathan Rees wrote: > Regarding Subbu's 202 suggestion, it's very clever, but both it and > your 204 idea are incompatible with the httpRange-14 rule (endorsed by > the LOD world, IIUC) which says "if an "http" resource responds to a > GET request with a 2xx response, then the resource identified by that > URI is an information resource". [This is very badly expressed - > what's meant is "if an HTTP server responds to a GET request" and so > on - but not difficult to repair.] My interpretation of Nathan's example is that the documentation creation starts in response to a write such as POST, in which 202 is valid. 202 on GET is goofy. SubbuReceived on Sunday, 14 March 2010 22:46:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:21 UTC