Anthony Bryan wrote: > ... >> Well, if there was a type called "type", it would be valid. >> >> It seems to me that >> >> "...and "type/*" indicating all subtypes of that type" >> >> is sufficiently clear. Do you think something like >> >> "...and "X/*" indicating all subtypes of type X" >> >> would make things clearer (this would be easier if IETF specs allowed font >> changes...). > > Yes, that would be easier... > > What about going from smaller to larger? > > The asterisk "*" character is used to group media types into ranges, > with "X/*" indicating all subtypes of type X and "*/*" indicating all > media types. > ... I have to say that I'm not sure that there's a problem here. What do others think? Best regards, JulianReceived on Monday, 8 February 2010 16:12:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:21 UTC