- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:21:17 +0100
- To: Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Anthony Bryan wrote: > 1) This read a bit awkward. I'm not sure if my suggestion retains the > original meaning. > > OLD > There may exist multiple representations associated with a particular > response status. > > NEW > It is possible for multiple representations to be associated with a > particular response status. The definitions of entity/representation/whatnot are on the TODO list anyway. That being said, how about: "Multiple representations may associated with a particular response status." > 2) I think this means "*" for subtype, for example "text/*" and not > literally "type/*". (While we literally mean "*/*"). Maybe because > this comes directly after the ABNF it is fine? > > The asterisk "*" character is used to group media types into ranges, > with "*/*" indicating all media types and "type/*" indicating all > subtypes of that type. I'm not sure what this refers to; could you please supply some context? > 3) Capitalize W? > > OLD > Note: while the definition of Content-MD5 > > NEW > Note: While the definition of Content-MD5 Yup. I just did that for all parts (<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/756>). Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 12:21:54 UTC