- From: Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@subbu.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:38:47 -0800
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
The usage of fields is not clear. Sec. 6.3 says that "entries in the Link Relation Type Registry can be extended with application-specific data". But the BNF in Sec. 5 does not specify fields. Could you clarify the intent of fields? Subbu On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:31 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Internet-Draft@ietf.org >> Date: 19 January 2010 4:30:02 PM AEDT >> To: mnot@pobox.com, draft-nottingham-http-link-header@tools.ietf.org,lisa.dusseault@gmail.com >> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt >> >> New version (-07) has been submitted for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt. >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt >> Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed >> >> Diff from previous version: >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07 >> >> IETF Secretariat. > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 21:39:25 UTC