- From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 21:35:18 +0200
- To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
- Cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
sön 2010-03-28 klockan 15:20 +0100 skrev Jamie Lokier: > > With certain types (Microsoft) of authentication You forgot to add "which is not true HTTP authentication schemes". That family of auth schemes makes many assumptions which is opposite the intentions of the HTTP specifications so using them as an example when trying to understand the wording of the specification text is not valid. Still interesting when talking about what should be said as they are a reality and something HTTP has to deal with today, but not when trying to understand why RFC2616 is written in a certain manner. Regards Henrik
Received on Sunday, 28 March 2010 19:35:52 UTC