Re: 100 Continue and Expects

sön 2010-03-28 klockan 15:20 +0100 skrev Jamie Lokier:
> With certain types (Microsoft) of authentication

You forgot to add "which is not true HTTP authentication schemes". That
family of auth schemes makes many assumptions which is opposite the
intentions of the HTTP specifications so using them as an example when
trying to understand the wording of the specification text is not valid.

Still interesting when talking about what should be said as they are a
reality and something HTTP has to deal with today, but not when trying
to understand why RFC2616 is written in a certain manner.


Received on Sunday, 28 March 2010 19:35:52 UTC