- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:22:10 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 11.03.2010 16:38, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Julian Reschke<julian.reschke@gmx.de> >> wrote: >>> >>> Should we recommend the behavior we see implemented (SHOULD? MUST?)? Note >>> that this would make current implementations of Opera and Safari >>> non-compliant. >> >> Is there a reason to use SHOULD rather than MUST? If not I'd say use MUST. > > Usually we don't add normative requirements on top of RFC 2616, unless we're > clearly fixing a bug (which is not the case here), or are confident that > we're just writing down what everybody is doing anyway. Why? Isn't the point of a spec to encourage interoperable behavior? / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 17:23:01 UTC