Mark Nottingham wrote: > > On 05/02/2010, at 11:24 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> HTML5 doesn't have rev anymore anyway (well, unless the WG changes this again) >> >> So why don't we just say that "rev" means what HTML2 used to say, and be done with it? > > Because (IMO) implementation experience has shown that rev= is horribly confusing* to developers, and will cause more problems than it solves; it's much better to just register a different relation (even if that does offend those who like tidiness). > > I'd be OK with putting it in the BNF, giving the HTML2 explanation, and deprecating it in prose, though. > ... That sounds good to me. Best regards, JulianReceived on Monday, 8 February 2010 08:24:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:21 UTC