ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2010: by date

Wednesday, 31 March 2010
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Mark Pauley
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Adrien de Croy
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Mark Pauley
Tuesday, 30 March 2010
- Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-11.txt Julian Reschke
- IETF77 meeting minutes Julian Reschke
Monday, 29 March 2010
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
Tuesday, 30 March 2010
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Adrien de Croy
Monday, 29 March 2010
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Jamie Lokier
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Jamie Lokier
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Mark Nottingham
- Re: Comment on draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-10 section 4.3 Julian Reschke
- Re: FYI: IETF LC for draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http Julian Reschke
- Re: #73: httpbis and deflate compression... Mark Nottingham
- Re: #73: httpbis and deflate compression... Martin J. Dürst
Sunday, 28 March 2010
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Henrik Nordström
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Henrik Nordström
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Jamie Lokier
- Re: #73: httpbis and deflate compression... Yves Lafon
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Greg Wilkins
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Jamie Lokier
Saturday, 27 March 2010
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Greg Wilkins
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects David Morris
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Greg Wilkins
Friday, 26 March 2010
- #73: httpbis and deflate compression... Mark Nottingham
- Re: httpbis and deflate compression... Dan Winship
- RE: httpbis and deflate compression... Mahdavi, Jamshid
- Re: httpbis and deflate compression... David Morris
Thursday, 25 March 2010
- Re: Issue 39: proposed example for varying the etag based on conneg Nathan
- proposal for issue #175 range flooding Yves Lafon
- Issue 39: proposed example for varying the etag based on conneg Julian Reschke
- proposal for issue #178 Yves Lafon
- Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] David Morris
- Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Yves Lafon
Tuesday, 23 March 2010
- Re: httpbis and deflate compression... Julian Reschke
- Re: httpbis and deflate compression... Dan Winship
- httpbis and deflate compression... Mahdavi, Jamshid
Monday, 22 March 2010
- Comment on draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-10 section 4.3 Chris Newman
- Re: DRAFT Anaheim agenda Julian Reschke
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
Sunday, 21 March 2010
- Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Henry S. Thompson
Friday, 19 March 2010
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA
- Re: RFC 5789 on PATCH Method for HTTP Julian Reschke
Thursday, 18 March 2010
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham
- HTTPbis Working Group meeting next Monday in Anaheim, CA Julian Reschke
Wednesday, 17 March 2010
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham
Monday, 15 March 2010
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Tim Berners-Lee
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Martin J. Dürst
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Roy T. Fielding
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no ?representation yet? Nathan
Sunday, 14 March 2010
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no ?representation yet? Nathan
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Subbu Allamaraju
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no ?representation yet? Jonathan Rees
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Subbu Allamaraju
- Re: 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Yves Lafon
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan
- Re: 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Julian Reschke
- Re: 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Nathan
- Re: 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Julian Reschke
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no ?representation yet? Nathan
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no ?representation yet? Reto Bachmann-Gmür
- 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan
Saturday, 13 March 2010
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Mark Nottingham
Friday, 12 March 2010
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Nathan
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonathan Rees
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Toby Inkster
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Nathan
- W3C Account and HTMLWG Participation "Unlinked" Jace Voracek
Thursday, 11 March 2010
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Nathan
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking
- Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonathan Rees
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
Wednesday, 10 March 2010
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Nathan Rixham
Thursday, 11 March 2010
- 300 Multiple Choices and safe methods Robert Brewer
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 10 March 2010
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-04.txt =JeffH
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-04.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Fwd: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments)] Nathan
- warning: redirect test cases broken, was: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-04.txt Adam Barth
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-04.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, ?Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
- Re: no-cache response directive Henrik Nordström
- Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Toby Inkster
- Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
- no-cache response directive Mark Nottingham
- Issues addressed in -09 drafts Mark Nottingham
Tuesday, 9 March 2010
- #204 (editorial): Clock requirement for caches Mark Nottingham
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham
- Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
- Re: rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt) Michael Hausenblas
- Re: rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt) Mark Nottingham
- Re: rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt) Michael Hausenblas
- Re: rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt) Mark Nottingham
- Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
- Re: HTTPbis Range header Mark Nottingham
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham
Monday, 8 March 2010
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age David Morris
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
- Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Adrien de Croy
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-03.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Sunday, 7 March 2010
- New version of Cache Context draft Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
- Re: HTTPbis Range header Yves Lafon
Saturday, 6 March 2010
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bil Corry
- Amazon.com - Your Cancellation (495-265546-13651) order-update@amazon.com
Friday, 5 March 2010
- HTTPbis Range header Nathan
- Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Julian Reschke
Thursday, 4 March 2010
- Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Roy T. Fielding
- Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Brian Smith
- rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt) Michael Hausenblas
- Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Julian Reschke
- Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Julian Reschke
- Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Roy T. Fielding
- DRAFT Anaheim agenda Mark Nottingham
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham
- Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 3 March 2010
- Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Yves Lafon
- Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
- Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Julian Reschke
- Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Yves Lafon
- Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Julian Reschke
- #147: header-specific canonicalisation Mark Nottingham
- Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
- Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham
Tuesday, 2 March 2010
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke
Monday, 1 March 2010
- Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt Mark Nottingham
Sunday, 28 February 2010
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- one time passwords from private keys Story Henry
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Friday, 26 February 2010
- Cache behavior for authenticated contents Yutaka OIWA
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Thursday, 25 February 2010
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bruno Harbulot
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bruno Harbulot
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Story Henry
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: [410 Gone] HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics Mark Baker
- [410 Gone] HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics Karl Dubost
Tuesday, 23 February 2010
- FYI: Anaheim IETF meeting Mark Nottingham
Monday, 22 February 2010
- Re: Expect: 100-continue and proxies Jeffrey Mogul
- FYI: IETF LC for draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http Julian Reschke
- Re: Expect: 100-continue and proxies Joe Orton
Sunday, 21 February 2010
- Re: Expect: 100-continue and proxies Jamie Lokier
- Expect: 100-continue and proxies Joe Orton
Friday, 19 February 2010
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 17 February 2010
- Re: p1-messaging proofreading Julian Reschke
Tuesday, 16 February 2010
- p1-messaging proofreading Anthony Bryan
Sunday, 14 February 2010
- Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Roy T. Fielding
- Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Adam Barth
Friday, 12 February 2010
- Re: Issue 10, was: User interface requirements for redirecting to ?unsafe methods Adam Barth
- Issue 10, was: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Julian Reschke
- Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Julian Reschke
- User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Maciej Stachowiak
Thursday, 11 February 2010
- Review of third Last Call of Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies Francois Daoust
Wednesday, 10 February 2010
- The meaning of rev Krzysztof Maczyński
- Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Adam Barth
- Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Amit Klein
Tuesday, 9 February 2010
- Re: issue 202, was: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Mark Nottingham
- Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Adam Barth
- Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Maciej Stachowiak
- RE: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Blake Frantz
- Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Amit Klein
- Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Adam Barth
- Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Tim
- issue 202, was: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Julian Reschke
- Security considerations for DNS rebinding Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Mark Nottingham
Monday, 8 February 2010
- Re: p2-semantics proofreading Julian Reschke
- Re: p3-payload proofreading Julian Reschke
- FWD: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-09.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Sunday, 7 February 2010
- p2-semantics proofreading Anthony Bryan
Friday, 5 February 2010
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Adam Barth
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Dan Winship
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Anne van Kesteren
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Anne van Kesteren
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Anne van Kesteren
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Anne van Kesteren
- allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- rfc2231-in-http: token characters, was: FYI: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-08.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Thursday, 4 February 2010
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Roy T. Fielding
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Anne van Kesteren
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 3 February 2010
- Re: Clarification of http-409 Julian Reschke
- Clarification of http-409 troels knak-nielsen
Tuesday, 2 February 2010
- Re: p3-payload proofreading Anthony Bryan
- Re: p3-payload proofreading Julian Reschke
- Re: p3-payload proofreading Anthony Bryan
- Re: p3-payload proofreading Julian Reschke
- p3-payload proofreading Anthony Bryan
Monday, 1 February 2010
- Re: p4-conditional proofreading Julian Reschke
- Re: p4-conditional proofreading Barry Leiba
- Re: p4-conditional proofreading Julian Reschke
- Re: FYI: Google blog on Unicode Julian Reschke
- FYI: Google blog on Unicode Martin J. Dürst
Sunday, 31 January 2010
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout mike amundsen
- Re: p4-conditional proofreading Barry Leiba
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bil Corry
- Re: p4-conditional proofreading Julian Reschke
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Saturday, 30 January 2010
- Re: Meeting plans re. Anaheim Anne van Kesteren
Friday, 29 January 2010
- p4-conditional proofreading Anthony Bryan
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bil Corry
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Subbu Allamaraju
- Re: exposing sensitive information in URIs - LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout figroc
Thursday, 28 January 2010
- Re: p5-range typo Julian Reschke
- p5-range typo Anthony Bryan
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout figroc
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Martin J. Dürst
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 27 January 2010
- Re: p7-auth typo Julian Reschke
- p7-auth typo Anthony Bryan
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth
- Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Adam Barth
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Friday, 22 January 2010
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Jan Algermissen
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Subbu Allamaraju
- Why do caching heuristics exclude 303? Michael Hausenblas
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Thursday, 21 January 2010
- Re: [hybi] Long-polling to monitor resources Salvatore Loreto
- Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Adam Barth
- Re: issue 201, was: header parsing, trailing OWS Julian Reschke
- issue 201, was: header parsing, trailing OWS Julian Reschke
- Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mike Burrows
- exposing sensitive information in URIs - LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication-Info Header Yutaka Oiwa
- Re: Authentication-Info Header Julian Reschke
- Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Julian Reschke
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Jan Algermissen
- Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Adam Barth
Wednesday, 20 January 2010
- FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Larry Masinter
- Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Subbu Allamaraju
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication-Info Header Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Authentication-Info Header Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [Fwd: WWW-Authenticate challenge for client-certificates] Bruno Harbulot
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification -?draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: WWW-Authenticate challenge for client-certificates Steve Dispensa
Tuesday, 19 January 2010
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mike Burrows
- Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Julian Reschke
- WWW-Authenticate challenge for client-certificates Bruno Harbulot
- FYI: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-08.txt Julian Reschke
- Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham
- Re: Meeting plans re. Anaheim Mark Nottingham
Sunday, 17 January 2010
- Meeting plans re. Anaheim? David Morris
Friday, 15 January 2010
- Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke
- Re: Content Negotiation again Julian Reschke
Thursday, 14 January 2010
- Long-polling to monitor resources ?
Wednesday, 13 January 2010
- Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke
- Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 =JeffH
- Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke
- Re: Content Negotiation again Julian Reschke
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Julian Reschke
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Robert Sayre
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout David Morris
- RE: Content Negotiation again Larry Masinter
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
- Re: Content Negotiation again Julian Reschke
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA
Saturday, 9 January 2010
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 =JeffH
- (Updating "content negotiation" language, issue 81), and TCN RFC 2295 to Proposed? Larry Masinter
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Albert Lunde
- Content Negotiation again Larry Masinter
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Mike Kelly
Friday, 8 January 2010
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Jan Algermissen
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Jan Algermissen
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout David Morris
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Jan Algermissen
Thursday, 7 January 2010
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout David Morris
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Nicolas Alvarez
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Albert Lunde
- Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Wednesday, 6 January 2010
- Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Julian Reschke
Saturday, 2 January 2010
- Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Henrik Nordstrom

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 23:00:26 UTC
Archived on: Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:22 UTC

ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2010 by date