ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org from April to June 2001 by author

Alan Kent

• Jim Whitehead's Hong Kong talk - Adding versioning to the web (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Versioning collections question (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Versioning collections question (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Versioning collections question (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baselin e resource type values (Thursday, 21 June)

Clemm, Geoff

• RE: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 6/29/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST (Friday, 29 June)
• RE: root-version (Thursday, 28 June)
• Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 6/29/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST (Thursday, 28 June)
• RE: Jim Whitehead's Hong Kong talk - Adding versioning to the web (Wednesday, 27 June)
• RE: Versioning collections question (Wednesday, 27 June)
• RE: Versioning collections question (Tuesday, 26 June)
• RE: Versioning collections question (Tuesday, 26 June)
• RE: Resolving outstanding issues in DeltaV (Monday, 25 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Sunday, 24 June)
• RE: Resolving outstanding issues in DeltaV (Sunday, 24 June)
• RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Sunday, 24 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: AW: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• Resolving outstanding issues in DeltaV (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: Re: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: CHECKIN to update a VCR ... (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: Re (2): Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: A simpler response ... RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: A simpler response ... RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: DAV:resourcetype (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: DAV:resourcetype (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Wednesday, 20 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Wednesday, 20 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Wednesday, 20 June)
• RE: Actually, you don't need COPY or MOVE, what you really seem to want is CLONE. (Wednesday, 20 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:ba seline resource type values (Wednesday, 20 June)
• RE: [ietf-dav-versioning] <none> (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Actually, you don't need COPY or MOVE, what you really seem t o want is CLONE. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: A compelling use case ... (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Actually, you don't need COPY or MOVE, what you really seem t o want is CLONE. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: [ietf-dav-versioning] <none> (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: DAV:precursor-set property (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: CHECKIN / CHECKOUT proposal from Geoff (Monday, 18 June)
• RE: Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT? (Monday, 18 June)
• Last call on the DAV:precursor-set property (Monday, 18 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Monday, 18 June)
• RE: Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT? (Monday, 18 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Saturday, 16 June)
• RE: CHECKIN / CHECKOUT proposal from Geoff (Saturday, 16 June)
• RE: A non-forking server, precussor revisited. (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: Question on Checking (of Working Resource vs. VCR): is this r ight? (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: Question on Checking (of Working Resource vs. VCR): is this r ight? (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: Question on Checking (of Working Resource vs. VCR): is this r ight? (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: Question on Checking (of Working Resource vs. VCR): is this r ight? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: A non-forking server, precussor revisited. (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Re (2): Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Re (2): Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Basic Property Behavior (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Deleting history (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: [ACL] RE: lock and access control lists on (working) versions (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: [ACL] RE: lock and access control lists on (working) versions (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Question on support for in-place editing (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: [ACL] RE: lock and access control lists on (working) versions (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion about what a VCR is (Tuesday, 12 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Tuesday, 12 June)
• RE: Question on support for in-place editing (Tuesday, 12 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Tuesday, 12 June)
• RE: [ACL] RE: A DAV:principal-match REPORT (Tuesday, 12 June)
• RE: Precursor set optional? (Tuesday, 12 June)
• A DAV:principal-match REPORT (Tuesday, 12 June)
• RE: Type appendix (Friday, 8 June)
• RE: Property-o-rama (Friday, 8 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Friday, 8 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Thursday, 7 June)
• RE: VCR properties (was: Removing the DAV:activity ...) (Thursday, 7 June)
• RE: MK* and lock-null (was: Re: Deleting versions) (Thursday, 7 June)
• RE: Property-o-rama (Thursday, 7 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: "nothing left to cut" (was: Re: [ACL] Owner issues) (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:ba seline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Monday, 4 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Monday, 4 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas elin e resource type values (Sunday, 3 June)
• RE: Resource class (Sunday, 3 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Sunday, 3 June)
• Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baselin e resource type values (Saturday, 2 June)
• RE: Re (2): Deleting versions (Saturday, 2 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Saturday, 2 June)
• RE: Resource class (Saturday, 2 June)
• RE: Resource class (Saturday, 2 June)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Deleting versions (Tuesday, 29 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Tuesday, 29 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Monday, 28 May)
• RE: lock and access control lists on (working) versions (Saturday, 26 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Saturday, 26 May)
• RE: Process for moving to Proposed Standard (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: Deleting versions (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: Process for moving to Proposed Standard (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: Table for autoversioning (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: checked-out VCC: A new proposal (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: The Label header, and other issues raised since draft-14 (Sunday, 13 May)
• RE: Resource class (Saturday, 12 May)
• RE: Pedantic (Saturday, 12 May)
• RE: VERSION-CONTROL with Location header? (Saturday, 12 May)
• RE: Dates (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d (Friday, 4 May)
• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d (Friday, 4 May)
• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d (Friday, 4 May)
• RE: target date for RFC on Versioning Extensions? (Monday, 30 April)
• RE: Workspace question (Saturday, 28 April)
• RE: Protocol support for maintaining a "local file area" on the client (Friday, 27 April)
• Protocol support for maintaining a "local file area" on the clien t (Friday, 27 April)
• RE: Re (2): Component instead of Configuration/Baseline/Component (Thursday, 26 April)
• RE: Component instead of Configuration/Baseline/Component (Monday, 23 April)
• RE: Workspace question (Saturday, 21 April)
• RE: Versioning Packages (Wednesday, 18 April)
• RE: checked-out VCC: A new proposal (Wednesday, 18 April)
• RE: Mention nested baselines in 15 (Wednesday, 18 April)
• RE: Proposed Simplifications to the DeltaV protocol (Tuesday, 17 April)
• The Label header, and other issues raised since draft-14 (Tuesday, 17 April)
• RE: Re (2): checked-out VCC: A new proposal (Monday, 16 April)
• Versioning Packages (Friday, 13 April)
• CHECKOUT and the working-resource feature (Friday, 13 April)
• RE: checked-out VCC: A new proposal (Thursday, 12 April)
• checked-out VCC: A new proposal (Thursday, 12 April)
• RE: checked-out VCC (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST) (Thursday, 12 April)
• RE: label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Fr iday) 12-1pm EST) (Wednesday, 11 April)
• RE: checked-out VCC (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST) (Wednesday, 11 April)
• RE: label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Fr iday) 12-1pm EST) (Tuesday, 10 April)
• RE: label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Fr iday) 12-1pm EST) (Tuesday, 10 April)
• RE: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST (Monday, 9 April)
• RE: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST (Sunday, 8 April)
• draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-14.1 is now available (Friday, 6 April)
• RE: FW: Meeting Notes for the 50th IETF Proceedings (Wednesday, 4 April)
• REVersioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST (Wednesday, 4 April)
• RE: FW: Meeting Notes for the 50th IETF Proceedings (Wednesday, 4 April)
• RE: FW: Meeting Notes for the 50th IETF Proceedings (Wednesday, 4 April)
• RE: prop in a MERGE request (Tuesday, 3 April)

Dan Brotsky

• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Thursday, 3 May)
• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Thursday, 3 May)

Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de

• Re: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re (2): Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Not missing the precursor (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re (2): Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re (2): Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re (3): Deleting versions (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re (2): Deleting versions (Friday, 1 June)
• Re (2): Component instead of Configuration/Baseline/Component (Thursday, 26 April)
• Component instead of Configuration/Baseline/Component (Sunday, 22 April)
• Mention nested baselines in 15 (Tuesday, 17 April)
• Re (2): checked-out VCC: A new proposal (Sunday, 15 April)
• Re (2): label header (Sunday, 15 April)
• version-controlled configuration always checked-out (Tuesday, 10 April)

Eric Sedlar

• RE: Dav:resourcetype (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: [ACL] RE: lock and access control lists on (working) versions (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: [ACL] RE: lock and access control lists on (working) versions (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: [ACL] RE: lock and access control lists on (working) versions (Tuesday, 12 June)
• RE: Confusion about what a VCR is (Tuesday, 12 June)
• RE: A DAV:principal-match REPORT (Tuesday, 12 June)
• RE: Resource class (Saturday, 12 May)
• RE: Summary: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Wednesday, 9 May)
• dav:resourcetype; ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org (Friday, 4 May)
• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Wednesday, 2 May)
• RE: label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST) (Tuesday, 10 April)

Fay, Chuck

• RE: checked-out VCC: A new proposal (Thursday, 19 April)
• RE: Table for autoversioning (Wednesday, 18 April)
• RE: The Label header, and other issues raised since draft-14 (Tuesday, 17 April)
• RE: checked-out VCC: A new proposal (Tuesday, 17 April)
• RE: FW: Meeting Notes for the 50th IETF Proceedings (Wednesday, 4 April)

Greg Stein

• Re: Proposed modification to CHECKOUT with the DAV:apply-to-version f lag (Wednesday, 27 June)
• VCR properties (was: Removing the DAV:activity ...) (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Re (2): Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Thursday, 7 June)
• MK* and lock-null (was: Re: Deleting versions) (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Re (2): Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• "nothing left to cut" (was: Re: [ACL] Owner issues) (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baselin e resource type values (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (Saturday, 2 June)
• Re: Versioning Packages (Thursday, 19 April)
• Re: The Label header, and other issues raised since draft-14 (Tuesday, 17 April)
• Re: The Label header, and other issues raised since draft-14 (Tuesday, 17 April)
• Re: Label header i18n, and RFC 2277 (Monday, 16 April)
• Re: label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Fr iday) 12-1pm EST) (Wednesday, 11 April)
• label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST) (Tuesday, 10 April)
• checked-out VCC (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST) (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST (Monday, 9 April)
• Re: prop in a MERGE request (Tuesday, 3 April)
• DAV:prop in a MERGE request (Tuesday, 3 April)

Harris, Matt

• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d (Wednesday, 2 May)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-15.txt (Wednesday, 25 April)

Jim Amsden

• Re: Resolving outstanding issues in DeltaV (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: DAV:resourcetype (Friday, 22 June)
• DAV:resourcetype (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: What is a supported property? (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: What is a supported property? (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Thursday, 21 June)
• DAV:resourcetype (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baselin e resource type values (Wednesday, 20 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:ba seline resource type values (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: [ietf-dav-versioning] <none> (Tuesday, 19 June)
• [ietf-dav-versioning] <none> (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baselin e resource type values (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Actually, you don't need COPY or MOVE, what you really seem to want is CLONE. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baselin e resource type values (Tuesday, 19 June)
• versioning lock null resources (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Process for moving to Proposed Standard (Thursday, 24 May)
• Process for moving to Proposed Standard (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: The Label header, and other issues raised since draft-14 (Tuesday, 17 April)
• Re: Label header i18n, and RFC 2277 (Tuesday, 17 April)
• RE: label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST) (Monday, 16 April)
• RE: label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Fr iday) 12-1pm EST) (Wednesday, 11 April)
• RE: label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST) (Tuesday, 10 April)

Jim Whitehead

• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: Basic Property Behavior (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: Property-o-rama (Thursday, 7 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Monday, 4 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Monday, 4 June)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Wednesday, 30 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Wednesday, 30 May)
• RE: Summary: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Thursday, 10 May)
• Summary: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: Workspace question (Saturday, 28 April)
• Workspace question (Friday, 20 April)
• RE: Table for autoversioning (Friday, 20 April)
• Table for autoversioning (Tuesday, 17 April)
• RE: The Label header, and other issues raised since draft-14 (Tuesday, 17 April)
• Label header i18n, and RFC 2277 (Monday, 16 April)
• RE: label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Fr iday) 12-1pm EST) (Thursday, 12 April)

John Hall

• DAV:root-version (Thursday, 28 June)
• RE: Resolving outstanding issues in DeltaV (Sunday, 24 June)
• RE: CHECKIN to update a VCR ... (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: A simpler response ... RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: A simpler response ... RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• A simpler response ... RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Thursday, 21 June)
• CHECKIN to update a VCR ... (Wednesday, 20 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Actually, you don't need COPY or MOVE, what you really seem to want is CLONE. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Actually, you don't need COPY or MOVE, what you really seem to want is CLONE. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: [ietf-dav-versioning] <none> (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT? (Monday, 18 June)
• RE: Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT? (Sunday, 17 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Saturday, 16 June)
• RE: CHECKIN / CHECKOUT proposal from Geoff (Saturday, 16 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Friday, 15 June)
• A compelling use case ... (Friday, 15 June)
• CHECKIN / CHECKOUT proposal from Geoff (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: Question on Checking (of Working Resource vs. VCR): is this r ight? (Thursday, 14 June)
• Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Re (2): Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• Question on Checking (of Working Resource vs. VCR): is this right? (Thursday, 14 June)
• A non-forking server, precussor revisited. (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Re (2): Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• Basic Property Behavior (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: [ACL] RE: lock and access control lists on (working) versions (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Question on support for in-place editing (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Tuesday, 12 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Tuesday, 12 June)

John Stracke

• Re: FW: Meeting Notes for the 50th IETF Proceedings (Tuesday, 3 April)

Juergen Reuter

• FYI: DeltaV implementation report available (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Dates (Thursday, 10 May)

Julian F. Reschke

• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Thursday, 7 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Tuesday, 29 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Monday, 28 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Monday, 28 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Monday, 28 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Thursday, 24 May)

Kevin Angus

• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)

Larry Masinter

• RE: Process for moving to Proposed Standard (Thursday, 24 May)

Lisa Dusseault

• RE: Resolving outstanding issues in DeltaV (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• Why it's bad to rely on other information to determine type (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: DAV:resourcetype (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baselin e resource type values (Wednesday, 20 June)
• RE: versioning lock null resources (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT? (Saturday, 16 June)
• RE: Question on Checking (of Working Resource vs. VCR): is this r ight? (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Question on support for in-place editing (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Confusion about what a VCR is (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Question on support for in-place editing (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Precursor set optional? (Tuesday, 12 June)
• RE: Resource type: a proposal (Friday, 8 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: AW: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Monday, 4 June)
• Protected properties... (Friday, 1 June)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Friday, 1 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Friday, 1 June)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Friday, 25 May)
• Deleting versions (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Thursday, 3 May)
• File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Wednesday, 2 May)

Mark A. Hale

• Re: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: resourcetype; ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org (Friday, 4 May)

Mark Chu-Carroll

• RE: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)

Patrik Fältström

• RE: label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST) (Tuesday, 10 April)

Peter Raymond

• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d (Thursday, 3 May)

Rick Rupp

• RE: A simpler response ... RE: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Actually, you don't need COPY or MOVE, what you really seem to want is CLONE. (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: Actually, you don't need COPY or MOVE, what you really seem to want is CLONE. (Wednesday, 20 June)
• [ietf-dav-versioning] <none> (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Confusion: Removing a resource from version control (Tuesday, 12 June)

Sridhar Erukulla

• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Thursday, 3 May)
• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Thursday, 3 May)

Stefan Eissing

• AW: Re: What is a supported property? (Saturday, 23 June)
• AW: Re: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Re: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• AW: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Friday, 22 June)
• AW: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• AW: Working Resource Issues ... (Thursday, 21 June)
• What is a supported property? (Thursday, 21 June)
• AW: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Thursday, 21 June)
• AW: [ietf-dav-versioning] <none> (Wednesday, 20 June)
• AW: AW: Actually, you don't need COPY or MOVE, what you really seem to want is CLONE. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• AW: Actually, you don't need COPY or MOVE, what you really seem t o want is CLONE. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• AW: Question on support for in-place editing (Wednesday, 13 June)
• AW: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Thursday, 7 June)
• AW: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Thursday, 7 June)
• AW: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV :baseline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• AW: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• AW: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Tuesday, 5 June)
• AW: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Tuesday, 5 June)
• AW: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Friday, 1 June)
• AW: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Monday, 28 May)
• AW: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Tuesday, 22 May)
• AW: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class ) (Tuesday, 22 May)
• AW: Resource class (Tuesday, 15 May)
• PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class) (Monday, 14 May)
• AW: Resource class (Monday, 14 May)
• AW: VERSION-CONTROL with Location header? (Friday, 11 May)
• VERSION-CONTROL with Location header? (Thursday, 10 May)

Steve K Speicher

• RE: Deleting versions (Wednesday, 6 June)

Tim Ellison

• Re: Jim Whitehead's Hong Kong talk - Adding versioning to the web (Wednesday, 27 June)
• RE: What is a supported property? (Wednesday, 27 June)
• RE: Versioning collections question (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Versioning collections question (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: Versioning collections question (Tuesday, 26 June)
• RE: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: Re: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Re: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: AW: What is a supported property? (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: DAV:resourcetype (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Why it's bad to rely on other information to determine type (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: DAV:resourcetype (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: DAV:resourcetype (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: What is a supported property? (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: What is a supported property? (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baselin e resource type values (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Wednesday, 20 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Wednesday, 20 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Wednesday, 20 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:ba seline resource type values (Wednesday, 20 June)
• RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: AW: AW: Actually, you don't need COPY or MOVE, what you really seem to want is CLONE. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baselin e resource type values (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Newbie questions (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baselin e resource type values (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: AW: Actually, you don't need COPY or MOVE, what you really seem t o want is CLONE. (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT? (Sunday, 17 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Friday, 15 June)
• Type appendix (Friday, 8 June)
• RE: Property-o-rama (Friday, 8 June)
• Property-o-rama (Thursday, 7 June)
• RE: Re (2): Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Thursday, 7 June)
• Resource type (was RE: AW: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values) (Thursday, 7 June)
• RE: MK* and lock-null (was: Re: Deleting versions) (Thursday, 7 June)
• RE: Protected properties... (Saturday, 2 June)
• RE: Resource class (Saturday, 2 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baselin e resource type values (Saturday, 2 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Friday, 25 May)

Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com

• RE: A non-forking server, precussor revisited. (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: A non-forking server, precussor revisited. (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: Question on Checking (of Working Resource vs. VCR): is this r ight? (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: A non-forking server, precussor revisited. (Friday, 15 June)
• Re: Re (2): Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Removing a resource: A compromise that satisfies? (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:ba seline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: AW: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV :baseline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Re (2): Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV :baseline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Re (2): Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Lock null resources (was RE: Deleting versions) (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV :baseline resource type values (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values (Monday, 4 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Friday, 1 June)
• RE: Deleting versions (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: Process for moving to Proposed Standard (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: lock and access control lists on (working) versions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: Resource class (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: AW: Resource class (Monday, 14 May)
• RE: Resource class (Monday, 14 May)
• AW: VERSION-CONTROL with Location header? (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Pedantic (Friday, 11 May)
• Resource class (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: VERSION-CONTROL with Location header? (Friday, 11 May)
• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Friday, 4 May)
• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Friday, 4 May)
• What was I thinkin' ? (was: RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified) (Friday, 4 May)
• RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Protocol support for maintaining a "local file area" on the clien t (Friday, 27 April)
• RE: Re (2): Component instead of Configuration/Baseline/Component (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: AW: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY (Thursday, 26 April)
• RE: Versioning Packages (Wednesday, 18 April)
• Re: Versioning Packages (Wednesday, 18 April)
• RE: The Label header, and other issues raised since draft-14 (Wednesday, 18 April)
• RE: checked-out VCC: A new proposal (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: checked-out VCC: A new proposal (Thursday, 12 April)
• RE: checked-out VCC (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST) (Wednesday, 11 April)
• RE: label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Fr iday) 12-1pm EST) (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: checked-out VCC (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Friday) 12-1pm EST) (Wednesday, 11 April)
• RE: label header (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 4/6/01 (Fr iday) 12-1pm EST) (Wednesday, 11 April)

Vladimir Grishchenko

• target date for RFC on Versioning Extensions? (Monday, 30 April)

Yaron Goland

• RE: [ACL] RE: lock and access control lists on (working) versions (Tuesday, 12 June)

Last message date: Friday, 29 June 2001 17:51:25 UTC