- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 12:58:10 -0400
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
From: Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de [mailto:Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de] Yesterday a posting told me that 15 is already availabe. (For some time already it seems if I look at the DELTA-V page). Actually, I got the "dates" a bit wrong when I updated the deltav page (those dates are entered by hand to the html page)... but after I noticed it, I figured it was close enough (at least the month was right). The introductory part on baselines is much clearer now. Good! Nevertheless I still would like to drop 'configuration' which only appears in this context and replace it by 'component'. As Geoff seems to be neutral on this topic, I really would like to see at least one or two other opinions. Yes, I am neutral. I believe Jim Amsden was the only one who responded so far (and he wanted to keep it "configuration", because "component" is so overused as a term). Just to expand a bit on my "neutrality", on one hand, the term "configuration" emphasizes the fact that it is "a set of things", but on the other hand, the term "component" emphasizes the fact that this is something you can plug in and plug out, which is exactly what you do when you create and select different baselines for a baselined collection. So on a purely technical basis, I probably prefer the term "component", but on an inertial basis (i.e. we've been calling it a configuration for a while now, and people seem OK with it), I prefer the term "configuration". So, either way is fine with me (:-). Cheers, Geoff
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2001 12:58:53 UTC