- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:53:04 -0700
- To: "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>, "DeltaV \(E-mail\)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
> > Therefore, I recommend that the DeltaV specification *keep* the > DAV:activity, DAV:version-history, and DAV:baseline resourcetype values. What about "version-controlled-resource", "version" and "workspace"? It would also be nice to identify a version-controlled collection in some way that it's also recognizable as a collection (e.g. <DAV:resourcetype><DAV:collection/><DAV:version-controlled-collection/></DAV :resourcetype> lisa
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2001 19:54:38 UTC