- From: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:45:21 +0100
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
"Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com> wrote: > I agree with Tim's point about the negative result > of having a feature called "checkout" when the CHECKOUT > method actually appears in two features (the "checkout" > feature and the "working resource" feature"). A more > "accurate" name for the "checkout" feature would be > "in-place-version-controlled-resource-checkout". I'm > really not very fond of this extended name (:-) ... > anyone have a better solution? > > One alternative that comes to mind is to fold the > "checkout" option into the "workspace" option, but as > I recall, there are folks that wanted to support the > "in-place checkout" but did not want to support workspaces. > Just to check, is there anyone out there that will be > supporting "in-place checkout" but not workspaces? I would like to see these options kept separate. > Alternatively, if anyone can come up with a better name > for the "in-place-version-controlled-resource-checkout" > feature, that would be appreciated! The 'in-place-' is superfluous. Given that the feature is to check out a vcr, it isn't going to get much shorter than 'version-controlled-resource-checkout':-| Tim
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2001 10:46:23 UTC