- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:51:00 -0400
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
OK, I officially recuse myself from this issue. Every time I read a post from one side or the other, I find myself agreeing with whoever posted last (which means I currently agree with John, but I'm sure it won't take much to switch me back again :-). So the only thing I am against is "MAY". Either we keep it in the protocol as a MUST (i.e. MUST be set on COPY), or we delete it. Other than that, just tell me which side won (:-). Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: John Hall [mailto:johnhall@evergo.net] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 11:30 PM To: 'Rick Rupp'; ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Subject: RE: [ietf-dav-versioning] <none> I disagree. I see no difference between creating a new version from scratch and copying data from somewhere else to create a new version from scratch. If I open file1 and then do a save-as on file2, the server doesn't know and precussor isn't set in any case. So why is it so important to know that someone grabbed a copy of file1's current version and copied it to file2 without editing it first? If you really want the version history, use MOVE not COPY. Do you have a 'for example' use case where that origin information is valuable? And would it still remain valuable after a few more edits were done? > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rick Rupp > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 5:39 PM > To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > Subject: [ietf-dav-versioning] <none> > > > The precursor-set property seems to be an important concept > of a versions > history. Without it there is no indication that a version has a > relationship to another version history. > > I don't think it will be unusual for a client to create a new > version by > copying from a different version history. Will it be > important to know the > new version came from a different version history? I think > the answer is > yes and the precursor-set facilitates this. > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2001 00:51:59 UTC