- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 17:49:24 +0200
- To: <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
I scanned the archives, but could not find anything about this. In case I missed it, my humble excuses for posting this again: The response to a VERSION-CONTROL request does not carry a Location header similar to CHECKIN (Draft 15). Now, I would propose that the client receives such a header in case the resource changed status from versionable to versioned (and is now checked-in). Scenario: with basic versioning a user might have checked out a number of resources for editing. Now he adds a couple of new resources which are initially not under version control. Then he (or rather his client application) tries to check in all resources he has created or changed, issuing CHECKIN and VERSION-CONTROL requests. Outcome 1: all requests succeed and the client application can display the version URIs of the checked-in versions to the user by using the Location headers of the responses. Outcome 2: resources were checked in our put under version control by someone else. In this case the client application can be aware of the modified resource by a) failed CHECKIN requests for already checked in resources b) missing Location headers for resource already under version control. Does this make sense to anyone but me? Stefan
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2001 11:50:38 UTC