- From: Tim Ellison <tim@peir.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 21:20:20 +0100
- To: "Ietf-Dav-Versioning" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
> From following the whole discussion, I can see what you're trying > to get at, but that wording is incredibly confusing. If I saw that > in a specification with no further explanation, I'd have no idea of > what it meant. > > Well, that wouldn't be a good thing (:-). All suggestions for > how to make this clearer/better are greatly appreciated! > However the "great resourcetype debate" falls out, minimally > we need to clearly define what the supported-*-set properties > mean. I have to agree that the suggested wording is very confusing (but I'll need a moment to think of a reasonable alternative). Tim
Received on Friday, 22 June 2001 16:20:22 UTC