- From: Eric Sedlar <Eric.Sedlar@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:06:40 -0700
- To: <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
I don't think we are getting close to a consensus on this issue. I'm personally in favor of using dav:resourcetype for type information (after Yaron used his Jedi mind tricks on me), but I don't care enough to argue about it anymore. Is there a defined IETF procedure for flipping a coin to decide on what to do with a spec, or some other source of randomness? How about if everybody agrees that if the Dow is an even number on Monday (at the close, truncating fractional part) we will put type information in dav:resourcetype, and if it is an odd number, we will use supported-*-resource-set (and go back to <dav:is-principal> in the ACL spec)? Deal? Geoff? (P.S. I have a suggested topic as an alternative for those who want to argue about this more: Is operator overloading in C++ a good idea or not? Discuss.) --Eric
Received on Friday, 22 June 2001 11:15:09 UTC