- From: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:42:03 +0100
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
I guess it just depends on which perspective you take. If you are looking at it from the baseline point of view then the version-controlled configuration should remain checked-in, but if you are looking at it from the baseline-controlled configuration then it should remain checked out. It can be argued either way, but I think of a version-controlled configuration as being 'more closely associated with' the baseline -- but don't ask me to give a good reason<g> So I would expect the version-controlled configuration to be in a checked-in state for most of the time, then be checked out and checked in to capture the new baseline (i.e. the opposite of the proposal). Regards, Tim Greg wrote: On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 01:19:58PM -0400, Clemm, Geoff wrote: > A version-controlled configuration is always associated with a > baseline-controlled collection (and is used to capture the state > of the configuration rooted at that baseline-controlled collection). > Since you can always check-out/modify/check-in the members of the > baseline-controlled collection, this effectively lets you modify > that membership of that baseline-controlled collection, unconstrained > by the current state of the associated version-controlled configuration. In the above description, you're modifying the baseline-controlled collection (BCC). You aren't modifying the VCC. I still see no point in putting the VCC in a permanently-checked-out state. If you're concerned about consistency between the BCC and the baseline referred to by the checked-in VCC, then the answer is to make the BCC readonly. Not to say the VCC is always checked out. Checking out the VCC would then allow the BCC to be modified. I have no opinion on whether a server can always (force) a VCC to remain checked out. But the spec should not mandate that situation. [ in Subversion, the VCC cannot be checked out and the BCC is readonly; you must use working resources to create a new baseline, all of which is then merged into the BCC and VCC ] Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2001 04:43:36 UTC