- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:23:50 -0700
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
I would like to see this pointed out explicitly in the spec (does not need to be normative though), rather than have the behaviour left to be induced. lisa > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 2:51 PM > To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > Subject: RE: Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT? > > > The versioning protocol places no restriction on who can > do an UNCHECKOUT (if there were, you would see it specified > as a precondition for the UNCHECKOUT method). > > Cheers, > Geoff > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Hall [mailto:johnhall@evergo.net] > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 5:24 PM > To: 'Clemm, Geoff'; ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > Subject: Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT? > > > > ... And if not, is there a provision for someone other than the person > who did the checkout performing an UNCHECKOUT? > >
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2001 12:25:30 UTC