RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal

John Hall wrote:
> In my system I have no problem tracking moves, but it isn't my
> objective.  My objective is having a CHECKIN of the working resource
> update the VCR.  That isn't a 'gee it would be nice to have' request.
> It is far more important to me than that.  Lack of such a feature would
> be quite painful.

I think you may have said this already, so apologies if you did.  Instead of
a new property on a working resource that tracks MOVEs (which I think will
be hard to implement on distributed systems), how about a new CHECKIN option
to do the checkin and version-controlled resource update atomically with a
specific error condition if either cannot be achieved?

I'd be happier with that.

Tim

Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2001 09:46:15 UTC