- From: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 11:58:53 +0100
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
"Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com> wrote: > I did another pass through the "packages" > description. In particular, I gave the common > intersection of all packages (which is just the > "version-control" feature) its own package name > (the "core-versioning" package). > > There is more information on the "server workspace" > and "client workspace" differences in the "workspace > feature" and "working resource feature" descriptions. > > Does this look OK? Yes. It would be preferrable if the features had names that did not collide with method names since that triped me up, and I can imagine it being a source of confusion in the future -- e.g. "when you say your server implements checkout, do you mean the 'checkout' feature or the 'CHECKOUT' method?", the feature being a subset of the method. wrt packages of features, I'm quite indifferent to the idea. Tim
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2001 06:59:48 UTC