- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:55:34 -0700
- To: "Fay, Chuck" <CFay@filenet.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Hmm, I hadn't realized we were moving towards new terminology for autoversioning. I've checked out the -15 draft, and I think the new autoversioning terminology is a step in the right direction. I'd still like to see the requirements listed in a tabular form. Chuck Fay wrote: > As I noted in my earlier message, I also prefer the old terminology. - Jim
Received on Friday, 20 April 2001 17:57:12 UTC