- From: Rick Rupp <rick.rupp@merant.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:56:03 -0700
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
- Cc: "DeltaV (E-mail)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
I don't mind if it is added. I also agree with the comment Mark made about getting a draft specification nailed down. We need this soon. At 06:02 AM 6/19/01 -0700, Mark A. Hale wrote: >'I don't mind if it is added' > >I do support your comment that additions like this only continue to add to >the >complexity of the protocol, however useful they may be. I think it is >fair to >say that a draft specification really needs to be nailed down soon and that >additional features like DAV:checked-out-vcr be added in the next version of >the specification. > > Thanks, > > Mark > > > >Quoting "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>: > > > The DAV:checked-out-vcr property addresses the use case where a > > working resource has been created for the purpose of updating a > > VCR, and then that VCR has been moved while the working resource > > was checked-out. Since the client cannot easily track the > > movement of the VCR, the DAV:checked-out-vcr property provides > > functionality that cannot be achieved by the current protocol > > for the client-workspace package (the server-workspace package > > does not have this problem, since it does not support working > > resources). > > > > Does anyone object to adding this functionality? I am ambivalent, > > in that I would prefer to not add functionality to the protocol > > (it's already complex enough), but this is useful, consistent > > functionality that does not present any interoperability issues. > > I'd like a few more "yes, add it in" or at least "I don't mind if it > > is added" comments from the working group before making this addition. > > > > As a reminder, the proposed additions to the protocol are: > > > > Add a protected DAV:checked-out-vcr property for a working resource. > > Set this property on the working resource created when a CHECKOUT with > > the DAV:apply-to-version flag is applied to a VCR. Add a > > postcondition to "CHECKIN" of a working resource that says that if > > there is a DAV:checked-out-VCR on the working resource, the specified > > VCR will automatically be updated to reflect the content and dead > > properties of the new version. Add a postcondition to "MOVE" of a VCR > > that says that if there is a DAV:checked-out-VCR that identifies that > > VCR, that property is updated to reflect the new location of the VCR. > > > > Cheers, > > Geoff > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2001 20:58:26 UTC