- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:02:41 -0400
- To: DeltaV <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
The only use case this addresses is that your client has issued a MKWORKSPACE/LOCK sequence, and that in the narrow time interval between the completion of the MKWORKSPACE request and the LOCK request, some other client has managed to discover the name of your new workspace and has issued a LOCK request that somehow gets in before yours. I believe that not only is the likelihood of this happening vanishingly small, but even if it does happen, your client would just use the "that workspace is already in use by someone else" response that it needs in case somebody got their MKWORKSPACE request in ahead of yours. Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Lisa Dusseault [mailto:lisa@xythos.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:08 PM To: Clemm, Geoff Cc: DeltaV Subject: RE: Deleting versions > > What is the (compelling :-) use case for creating a lock-null > resource before issuing the MKWORKSPACE request? > What other way would you create a workspace and guarantee that it can't be altered by other people before you set permissions and such correctly? Same goes for ACTIVITY. lisa
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2001 15:58:05 UTC