- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:27:18 +0200
- To: "DeltaV \(E-mail\)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]Im Auftrag von > Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com > [...] > > My view of the world... > > Here's the list of elements that could appear in a DAV:resourcetype. Some > of these can be combined to provide a really meaningful experience for the > client. Obviously, some combinations are invalid. > <DAV:checked-in/> > <DAV:checked-out/> > <DAV:collection/> > <DAV:working-resource/> > <DAV:version-controlled-resource/> > <DAV:version/> > <DAV:version-history/> > <DAV:workspace/> > <DAV:version-controlled-configuration/> > <DAV:baseline/> > <DAV:activity/> > What is your rationale for checked-in/out in the type? I think I have missed something in the spec, since it feels like a property to me. > So, > <DAV:resourcetype> > <DAV:activity/> > </DAV:resourcetype > > would be good, that is, not surprisingly, an activity resource. > > <DAV:resourcetype> > <DAV:checked-out/> > <DAV:version-controlled-resource/> > <DAV:collection/> > <DAV:workspace/> > </DAV:resourcetype> > > would be good too, it is a checked-out, version-controlled resource for a > workspace collection. And so on. > > Tim > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 06:28:21 UTC