www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from April to June 2000 by author

5pcSOZs8e@a-bcomputers.co.uk

• great web hosting deals (Saturday, 13 May)

Ace

• maxOccurs depends on minOccurs (Tuesday, 11 April)

achille@us.ibm.com

• Open Content Model like in XDR schema (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Help on wildcard (Tuesday, 9 May)

Adrian Robert

• Typos in Primer Section 3.1 (Wednesday, 12 April)

Anders W. Tell

• Suggestion: Microparsing support in XML Schema (long) (Wednesday, 10 May)

Andrew Layman

• RE: 'obtain' in the sense of 'succeed' is archaic (Tuesday, 30 May)

Ani Pedersen

• Multi-field key (Tuesday, 11 April)

Arnold, Curt

• LC-136: symbolic constants (Wednesday, 21 June)
• LC-56: schemaPrefix (Wednesday, 21 June)
• Processing instructions and/or comments in elements with simpleTy pe content (Tuesday, 20 June)
• RE: Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 2 (Friday, 2 June)
• RE: Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 2 (Thursday, 1 June)
• Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 2 (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Inconsistency on content model for group (Thursday, 11 May)
• ANN: XML Schema Compilation Project on SourceForge (Thursday, 20 April)
• ANN: HTMLHelp file for 7 April XML Schema (Wednesday, 19 April)
• RE: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) (Tuesday, 18 April)
• RE: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Part2.xsd will not display in IE5 (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Datatypes: minor typographical issues (Wednesday, 12 April)
• XPath built-in datatype (Thursday, 6 April)

Asir S Vedamuthu

• RE: [Clarification]: Analysis of using XML Schemas Datatypes in the XForms Data Model (Wednesday, 24 May)
• [Clarification]: Analysis of using XML Schemas Datatypes in the XForms Data Model (Wednesday, 24 May)
• [Help Me Understand] Part 1 Structures, Section 5.11 Complex Type Definition Constraints - Type Derivation OK (Thursday, 4 May)

Barnette, Jim

• FW: Response to XML Last Call comment 83 "Better support for Sema ntic s" (Thursday, 15 June)
• Response to XML Last Call comment 83 "Better support for Semantic s" (Tuesday, 13 June)

bench@linuxmail.org

• laser printer toner advertisement (Monday, 3 April)

Bill Lewis

• [www-xml-schema-comments] <none> (Monday, 1 May)

Biron,Paul V

• RE: NMTOKEN elements? (Thursday, 29 June)
• Re: xsd:appinfo (Thursday, 15 June)
• RE: Normative DTD [was: Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3] (Wednesday, 14 June)
• RE: [Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>] [Moderator Action] regular expressions (Thursday, 8 June)
• RE: Easier way to define enumerations (Wednesday, 31 May)
• RE: Easier way to define enumerations (Thursday, 25 May)

bmark1@atlantaoffice.com

• your imaging supplies (Thursday, 22 June)
• your imaging supplies (Sunday, 9 April)

Box, Don

• RE: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) (Thursday, 20 April)
• RE: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) (Tuesday, 18 April)

Bruce Peat

• Re: W3C Schema Work Machinations. (Wednesday, 12 April)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• Issue LC-177 (Tighten conformance rules?) (Friday, 30 June)
• XML Schema issue LC-204 (was: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (2nd part)) (Thursday, 29 June)
• Re: NMTOKEN elements? (Thursday, 29 June)
• Re: Attribute declarations after complex type definitions (Wednesday, 21 June)
• Re: public version of the XML Schema Last Call issues list (Saturday, 17 June)
• public version of the XML Schema Last Call issues list (Saturday, 17 June)
• Re: dynamic element name specification. (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: Help with Groups (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: BC Dates (Tuesday, 9 May)

cedric thienot

• What about no deterministic aspect? (Thursday, 22 June)
• Inconsistency between equivClass and key ? (Wednesday, 7 June)

Charles Campbell

• Fwd: XMLSchema (Saturday, 27 May)

Cohen, Aaron M

• RE: XML-Schema Requirements for SMIL (Monday, 15 May)
• XML-Schema Requirements for SMIL (Monday, 3 April)

Curt Arnold

• Comments on Section 6.3/(Locating Schema resources) (Thursday, 11 May)
• Resolution of QNames references (Thursday, 11 May)
• Minor part 1 comments (Thursday, 11 May)
• equivClass: common ancestor type (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: Comments on Part 0: Primer (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Comments on Part 0: Primer (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Namespace of has-facet, has-property (Tuesday, 2 May)
• XML Schema compiler/New Issue: name for the urType (Monday, 1 May)
• Re: Proper home namespace/resource for built-in datatypes (Thursday, 27 April)
• Few comments (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: SimpleTypes derived by restriction (Wednesday, 26 April)
• imports, includes and namespace prefixes (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: Proper home namespace/resource for built-in datatypes (Friday, 21 April)
• Proper home namespace/resource for built-in datatypes (Friday, 21 April)
• Initial issues with schema for schemas (Tuesday, 18 April)
• User interface default values (Friday, 7 April)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Note on DTD-related questions (Monday, 19 June)
• Re: Note on DTD-related questions (Friday, 16 June)
• Re: Note on DTD-related questions (Friday, 16 June)
• Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: XML-Schema Requirements for SMIL (Tuesday, 16 May)
• Re: [comment] Mixed Content Model (Friday, 12 May)
• Re: XML-Schema Requirements for SMIL (Friday, 12 May)
• Re: HTML WG last call remark (no way to declare entities?) (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? (Saturday, 29 April)
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? (Saturday, 29 April)
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? (Friday, 28 April)

Dan Rupe

• Comment on last call of Schema doc (Friday, 12 May)

Dan Vint

• Questions about Schema and DTD in parts 1 and 2 (Tuesday, 2 May)
• Problems in Datatypes pt 2 (A Schema for Datatype Definitions (no rmative)) #2 (Tuesday, 2 May)
• Problems in Datatypes pt 2 (A Schema for Datatype Definitions (no rmative)) (Tuesday, 2 May)

Daniel Veillard

• Attribute remapping support in XML Schemas (Friday, 19 May)

Dario de Judicibus

• Few comments and two proposals about the latest draft (2000-04-07) (Tuesday, 25 April)

David Beech

• Normative DTD [was: Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3] (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (3rd part) (Friday, 9 June)
• Re: 'obtain' in the sense of 'succeed' is archaic (Wednesday, 7 June)
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Wednesday, 7 June)
• Re: DOM WG comments on the schema Last Call (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: 'form' and 'elementFormDefault' appear harmful (Tuesday, 16 May)

David Ezell

• LC-98. ns-and-schemaloc: Clarifying schema location and namespace (Friday, 9 June)

David RR Webber

• MIS Managers? (Friday, 12 May)
• Re: W3C Schema Work Machinations. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: W3C Schema Work Machinations. (Tuesday, 11 April)

David Valera

• minor errors in part 0: primer (Monday, 5 June)

David Wang

• Re: XML Schema Last Call working drafts released (Monday, 10 April)

dejudicibus@it.ibm.com

• Entities (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: Few comments (Thursday, 27 April)

Don Brutzman

• X3D-related comments on Schema datatypes (Saturday, 13 May)

Doug Ransom

• Integer and Nonegative Integer (Friday, 5 May)

Dr. Ardeshir Bahreininejad

• dynamic element name specification. (Wednesday, 3 May)

DuCharme, Robert

• RE: NMTOKEN elements? (Thursday, 29 June)
• RE: NMTOKEN elements? (Thursday, 29 June)
• NMTOKEN elements? (Friday, 23 June)

Equipo de Soporte

• La Noticia de Boleon-El traductor y los superdominios (Monday, 10 April)

Eve L. Maler

• XML Linking WG comments on XML Schema Last Call specifications (Tuesday, 30 May)

Falk, Alexander

• RE: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: Comments on regular expressions (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Comments and questions on the last call XML Schema working draft (Monday, 10 April)

Francis Norton

• missing use case? (Friday, 19 May)

gmacri@libero.it

• Questio on Prefix before parameter (Friday, 9 June)
• Question on Equivalence Classes (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Question on "ref" attribute (Sunday, 14 May)
• Question on include (Thursday, 11 May)
• Question on XPath expression (Monday, 8 May)
• Question on namespace and schemalocation (Saturday, 6 May)
• Questions on "Block" and namespace (Monday, 1 May)
• Questions (Friday, 14 April)

GoodNews

• Good News from College Broadcast! (Thursday, 22 June)

Graham Klyne

• XML schema -- numeric values (Saturday, 20 May)

GRMEYER@de.ibm.com

• typo in example (Monday, 17 April)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: NMTOKEN elements? (Thursday, 29 June)
• Re: suggestion to equivClass (Wednesday, 28 June)
• Re: Processing instructions and/or comments in elements with simpleTy pe content (Saturday, 24 June)
• Whitespace normalisation (was Re: NMTOKEN elements?) (Friday, 23 June)
• Re: LC-56: schemaPrefix (Thursday, 22 June)
• Re: What about no deterministic aspect? (Thursday, 22 June)
• Re: Schema Validation (Monday, 19 June)
• Re: XML Schema and parser (Wednesday, 14 June)
• Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: (Clarification on xsi:type) was Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Saturday, 10 June)
• Re: Questio on Prefix before parameter (Friday, 9 June)
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Friday, 9 June)
• [Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>] [Moderator Action] sequences (Thursday, 8 June)
• [Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>] [Moderator Action] regular expressions (Thursday, 8 June)
• Re: Inconsistency between equivClass and key ? (Wednesday, 7 June)
• Re: [Mark Benvenuto <t-markbe@microsoft.com>] Structures Spec Comments / XSV Error (Wednesday, 7 June)
• [Mark Benvenuto <t-markbe@microsoft.com>] Structures Spec Comments / XSV Error (Wednesday, 7 June)
• Re: mistake in example (Tuesday, 6 June)
• Re: constructing complex types (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: extension vs restriction (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: Positional data (Friday, 2 June)
• Re: Root element/ association of a schema targetNamespaceof to an instance/ maxOccurs. (Friday, 2 June)
• Re: Dates, time, positional data; conformance; and minor edits. (Friday, 2 June)
• Re: Question on Equivalence Classes (Friday, 2 June)
• Your issue wrt URIs for datatypes and facets (Thursday, 1 June)
• Re: [Joey Coyle <joey@xcoyle.com>] restriction (Friday, 26 May)
• [Joey Coyle <joey@xcoyle.com>] restriction (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: 3.4: {name} of the Ur-Type (Thursday, 25 May)
• Re: Questions on "Block" and namespace (Thursday, 25 May)
• Re: Attribute remapping support in XML Schemas (Monday, 22 May)
• Re: [Moderator Action] problem with validating against multiple, independent schemas (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: general schema and subschema's (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: Named type definitions inside element declarations? (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: null and keyref (Tuesday, 16 May)
• Re: Question on "ref" attribute (Sunday, 14 May)
• Re: Please make well-known URIs for all built-in datatypes and facets (Saturday, 13 May)
• Lee Buck's use case returns: a hesitant proposal for type modification (Friday, 12 May)
• Error logging in the infoset (Friday, 12 May)
• Content model of <complexType> (Friday, 12 May)
• Re: Question on include (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: Resolution of QNames references (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: minor comments for WD-xmlschema-1-20000407 (Thursday, 11 May)
• [Michael Anderson <michael@research.canon.com.au>] Restricting Facets (Wednesday, 10 May)
• Re: Question on XPath expression (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: Question on namespace and schemalocation (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: Use of xml:lang (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: Questions about optional and abset (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: Comments on Part 0: Primer (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: 4.3.1: second scenario: should value constraint default to FIXED? (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 (Tuesday, 2 May)
• Re: Using appinfo annotations to store integrity constraints (Monday, 1 May)
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? (Monday, 1 May)
• Re: Questions on "Block" and namespace (Monday, 1 May)
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? (Saturday, 29 April)
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: 4.3.7: can ##local stand alone in namespace attribute or must it be in a list? (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: 4.3.3: should "anyAttribute" have a "processContents" attribute? (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: 3.4/3.13: should there be a Simply Type Definition of the Ur-Type ? (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: 3.4: why does absent point to definition for null in glossary? (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: 3.4: {name} of the Ur-Type (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Declaration? (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Decl aration? (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: Proper home namespace/resource for built-in datatypes (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: Datatypes: minor typographical issues (Wednesday, 12 April)
• xsi:null and keyref (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: maxOccurs depends on minOccurs (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: P3P and XML Schemas (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: Schema Information Set Contribution: Identity-constraint Table (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: Problems with P3P XML schema (Tuesday, 4 April)

hifiber7@pplmail.com

• AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More (Monday, 17 April)

IIAC.NET

• WEB MARKETING SOLUTIONS (Monday, 29 May)

Ivan Kurmanov

• Re[2]: XML Schema Structures (Monday, 12 June)
• XML Schema Structures (Monday, 5 June)

James Tauber

• 4.3.1: second scenario: should value constraint default to FIXED? (Wednesday, 3 May)
• 4.3.1: representation of {target namespace} in second case has pa rent instead of ancestor (Friday, 28 April)
• 3.2 / 4.3.1: {value contraint} in top-level attribute declaration s (Friday, 28 April)
• RE: 4.3.7: can ##local stand alone in namespace attribute or must it be in a list? (Friday, 28 April)
• 4.3.7: can ##local stand alone in namespace attribute or must it be in a list? (Friday, 28 April)
• 4.3.3: should "anyAttribute" have a "processContents" attribute? (Friday, 28 April)
• RE: 3.4/3.13: should there be a Simply Type Definition of the Ur- Type ? (Friday, 28 April)
• 3.4/3.13: should there be a Simply Type Definition of the Ur-Type ? (Friday, 28 April)
• 3.4: why does absent point to definition for null in glossary? (Friday, 28 April)
• 3.4: {name} of the Ur-Type (Friday, 28 April)
• RE: 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Declaration? (Friday, 28 April)
• 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Decl aration? (Friday, 28 April)

Jane Hunter

• MPEG-7 Feedback to Last Call for Review (Friday, 12 May)
• Use of xml:lang (Thursday, 4 May)

Jerome Simeon

• XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) (Thursday, 18 May)

Jim Trezzo

• Fwd: Re: comments on XML Schema part 2: Precision/Scale (Friday, 2 June)
• Oracle Comments on XML Schema Last Call: (Friday, 12 May)

Joey Coyle

• Re: [Joey Coyle <joey@xcoyle.com>] restriction (Friday, 26 May)

John Boyer

• RE: Make it easy to create signable schemas (was: Re: XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema) (Friday, 12 May)

Jonathan Robie

• LC-82 XML Schema considered inadequately extensible (Thursday, 8 June)
• Cotton on Collation (Friday, 2 June)

Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

• Re: Make it easy to create signable schemas (was: Re: XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema) (Thursday, 11 May)
• Reagle's comments on XML Schema (Wednesday, 10 May)
• XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema (Wednesday, 10 May)
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? (Tuesday, 2 May)
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? (Monday, 1 May)
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? (Friday, 28 April)

kbagepalli@informatica.com

• Final schema draft (Thursday, 4 May)

Lauren Wood

• DOM WG comments on the schema Last Call (Thursday, 25 May)

Lewinsohn

• Schema (Saturday, 3 June)

Lindsey McNerney

• Schema Validation (Sunday, 18 June)

Mabry, F. DR EECS

• Positional data (Friday, 2 June)
• Dates, time, positional data; conformance; and minor edits. (Wednesday, 31 May)
• http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xmlschema-2-20000407/datatypes.html (Wednesday, 31 May)

Marc Wilkson

• question XML-EDI (Wednesday, 19 April)

Martin Bryan

• Decimal markers (Friday, 30 June)
• Re: Datatypes comments (Sunday, 14 May)
• Re: Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values (Thursday, 13 April)
• Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values (Thursday, 13 April)
• Questions relating to data types (Thursday, 13 April)
• Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values (Thursday, 13 April)

Martin Gudgin

• Re: Attribute remapping support in XML Schemas (Sunday, 21 May)
• Re: Attribute remapping support in XML Schemas (Saturday, 20 May)

Martin J. Duerst

• Fwd: Excerpt from I18N f2f minutes on XML Schema (Monday, 26 June)
• Re: Attribute declarations after complex type definitions (Wednesday, 21 June)
• RE: Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 2 (Friday, 2 June)
• RE: Easier way to define enumerations (Thursday, 1 June)
• Re: Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 2 (Thursday, 1 June)
• Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 1 (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 2 (Wednesday, 31 May)
• RE: 'obtain' in the sense of 'succeed' is archaic (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Identifying obsolete features (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Extensibility (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Misc. comments on XML Schema part 2 (Tuesday, 30 May)
• No identifiers with spaces or hyphens (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Order and desity of presentation in Part 2 (Tuesday, 30 May)
• XML Schema for lightweight clients? (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Part 2: Precision/scale (Monday, 29 May)
• These specs need some graphics (Monday, 29 May)
• 'obtain' in the sense of 'succeed' is archaic (Monday, 29 May)
• Part 2: Precision/scale (Monday, 29 May)
• RE: Easier way to define enumerations (Friday, 26 May)
• Attribute declarations after complex type definitions (Sunday, 21 May)
• Easier way to define enumerations (Sunday, 21 May)
• Some last-call comments (Sunday, 21 May)
• RE: Make it easy to create signable schemas (was: Re: XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema) (Sunday, 14 May)
• Re: Make it easy to create signable schemas (was: Re: XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema) (Friday, 12 May)
• Make it easy to create signable schemas (was: Re: XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema) (Thursday, 11 May)
• P3P and XML Schemas (Friday, 7 April)
• Problems with P3P XML schema (Tuesday, 4 April)

Matthew Fuchs

• RE: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Friday, 19 May)

Micah Dubinko

• Last Call comments from the XForms Working group (Monday, 22 May)

Mick Goulish

• Comments on the XML Schema Specification (Thursday, 25 May)

Mikael Ståldal

• Default values vs. validation (Monday, 17 April)

Miller, Robert (GXS)

• General Comments on Schema Specifications (Tuesday, 2 May)

Misha Wolf

• FW: More I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 0 (Thursday, 1 June)

mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp

• Re: Note on DTD-related questions (Tuesday, 20 June)
• Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> (Tuesday, 20 June)

MURATA Makoto

• Re: Note on DTD-related questions (Friday, 16 June)

muraw3c@attglobal.net

• Re: Note on DTD-related questions (Monday, 19 June)

Murray Altheim

• Re: Note on DTD-related questions (Friday, 16 June)
• Re: Note on DTD-related questions (Wednesday, 14 June)

nchen

• RE: [comment] Mixed Content Model (Tuesday, 13 June)
• [comment] Mixed Content Model (Friday, 12 May)
• RE: [Clarifications] Part 2 Datatypes (Thursday, 11 May)

Nik Klever

• Re: suggestion to equivClass (Wednesday, 28 June)
• suggestion to equivClass (Wednesday, 28 June)

Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

• Re: XML Schema Structures (Saturday, 10 June)
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (3rd part) (Friday, 9 June)
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (3rd part) (Friday, 9 June)
• RE: Easier way to define enumerations (Saturday, 3 June)
• Re: [Joey Coyle <joey@xcoyle.com>] restriction (Friday, 26 May)
• DOM WG comments on the schema Last Call (Thursday, 25 May)
• Re: Question on namespace and schemalocation (Wednesday, 24 May)
• re: Multi-field key (Monday, 22 May)
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: 'form' and 'elementFormDefault' appear harmful (Friday, 12 May)
• Re: 'form' and 'elementFormDefault' appear harmful (Friday, 12 May)
• New Issue: name for the urType (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? (Friday, 28 April)
• Re: Proper home namespace/resource for built-in datatypes (Thursday, 27 April)
• RE: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: XPath built-in datatype (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: Multi-field key (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: P3P and XML Schemas (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: User interface default values (Tuesday, 11 April)

Paul Cotton

• XML Query Comments to XML Schema (2nd part) (Monday, 29 May)

Paula Angerstein

• Core WG comments on XML Schema wrt Infoset (Thursday, 18 May)

Perry A. Caro

• [RESEND] Re: Please make well-known URIs for all built-in datatypes and facets (Friday, 12 May)

Peter A. Berggren

• blockDefault in Section 4.7 of XML Schema Part 0 : Primer (Wednesday, 12 April)

Peter Canning

• Named type definitions inside element declarations? (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Questions about optional and abset (Wednesday, 3 May)

Peter Fankhauser

• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (mixed content?) (Thursday, 25 May)

Peter van de Hoef

• Instance-parameterised constraints (Thursday, 25 May)

petsa@us.ibm.com

• Re: NMTOKEN elements? (Friday, 23 June)
• Re: constructing complex types (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: [Clarification]: Analysis of using XML Schemas Datatypes in the XForms Data Model (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Re: Easier way to define enumerations (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: 'form' and 'elementFormDefault' appear harmful (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: Please make well-known URIs for all built-in datatypes and facets (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Tuesday, 16 May)
• RE: note from Aram Arapetian (Tuesday, 16 May)
• Oracle comments on recurringDuration (Tuesday, 16 May)
• Re: null and keyref (Tuesday, 16 May)
• (no subject) (Tuesday, 16 May)
• Re: Datatypes comments (Friday, 12 May)
• Re: Disjoint datatypes? (Wednesday, 3 May)
• nonPositiveInteger (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: XML Schema Datatypes comments (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Comments and questions on the last call XML Schema working draft (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Questions relating to data types (Friday, 14 April)

Philip Wadler

• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Friday, 9 June)
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Thursday, 8 June)
• XML Query Comments to XML Schema (3rd part) (Friday, 2 June)
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Tuesday, 30 May)
• XML Schema Structure (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Thursday, 18 May)
• Simplifying XML Schema (Friday, 12 May)

Priscilla Walmsley

• Re: Entities (Wednesday, 14 June)

Rajesh Kumar

• RE: XML Schema Question: default namespace misses attributes (Thursday, 25 May)

rajeshwari

• validating parser for xml (Monday, 3 April)

Ralph R. Swick

• 'form' and 'elementFormDefault' appear harmful (Friday, 12 May)
• Please make well-known URIs for all built-in datatypes and facets (Friday, 12 May)
• xsd:appinfo (Thursday, 11 May)

Ray Waldin

• RE: [Clarification]: Analysis of using XML Schemas Datatypes in t he XForms Data Model (Thursday, 25 May)
• Analysis of using XML Schemas Datatypes in the XForms Data Model (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Re: SimpleTypes derived by restriction (Wednesday, 26 April)
• SimpleTypes derived by restriction (Wednesday, 26 April)

Ray_Gates@manulife.com

• Shipper/biller vs. Shippee/billee in part 0 (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Possible error in Part 0 - report.xsd (Tuesday, 18 April)

Richard Tobin

• Content models that are not regular expressions (Wednesday, 26 April)

richard torres

• extension vs restriction (Friday, 26 May)

Rick JELLIFFE

• (Clarification on xsi:type) was Re: Simplifying XML Schema (Friday, 9 June)
• RE: Easier way to define enumerations (Thursday, 1 June)
• RE: Using appinfo annotations to store integrity constraints (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: ANN: XML Schema Compilation Project on SourceForge (Friday, 21 April)

Roger L. Costello

• XML Schema Comments (Friday, 12 May)

rschloss@us.ibm.com

• Unique Particle Attribution with Choice groups that contain Sequence Groups (Wednesday, 10 May)

S_PERROTT

• Root element/ association of a schema targetNamespaceof to an instance/ maxOccurs. (Thursday, 1 June)

Simon St.Laurent

• RE: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 (Monday, 12 June)

Smith, Michael K

• Suggested rewording in'3.8 Particle Details' (Monday, 8 May)

Steve Monk

• Re: [Moderator Action] problem with validating against multiple, independent schemas (Friday, 19 May)

Steven Goldfarb

• Comment on XML Schema Working Draft (Friday, 12 May)

Steven Pemberton

• HTML WG last call remark (Wednesday, 3 May)

Susan Lesch

• RE: 'obtain' in the sense of 'succeed' is archaic (Wednesday, 31 May)
• minor typos in WD-xmlschema-2-20000407 (Friday, 12 May)
• minor comments for WD-xmlschema-1-20000407 (Thursday, 11 May)

TAMURA Kent

• Comments on regular expressions (Monday, 10 April)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Element names should be xml:ids in schemas (Thursday, 11 May)

Volker Renneberg

• mistake in example (Tuesday, 6 June)

Vun Kannon, David

• Disjoint datatypes? (Wednesday, 3 May)
• RE: Using appinfo annotations to store integrity constraints (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Using appinfo annotations to store integrity constraints (Monday, 1 May)

William FERRERES

• XML Schema and parser (Tuesday, 13 June)

Yuichi Koike

• Re: P3P and XML Schemas (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: P3P and XML Schemas (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: P3P and XML Schemas (Thursday, 13 April)

Last message date: Friday, 30 June 2000 15:02:41 UTC