W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: P3P and XML Schemas

From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:10:28 -0400
To: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Cc: duerst@w3.org, www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF07FF016C.82CDB9E7-ON852568BD.007F4D58@lotus.com>
I believe that in this respect we are at least as expressive as DTDs.  In 
other words, schemas can model:


We additionally provide the equivalent of:

        ( (A?) & (B)  &(C?) &(D))

In other words, a B and a D, with optional A and C, all in any order.  So 
we are already better than DTD.  We cannot do:

        ((A*) & (B) & (C?)) & (D))

which I believe is being requested.  I think it's reasonable that we 
consider this, but I think we should reserve the right to decline.  There 
are lots of 80/20 points in all this, and we are already better than DTD, 
I think.  What about:

        <all> <any namespace="XXX"/> </all>

(Any number of elements from namespace XXX, all in any order, and at most 
once.)  Very useful, especially as a base class, but also not supported. 
We have to draw the line somewhere.

Noah Mendelsohn                                    Voice: 1-617-693-4036
Lotus Development Corp.                            Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142

ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Sent by: www-xml-schema-comments-request@w3.org
04/07/00 04:13 AM

        To:     "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>
        cc:     www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, (bcc: Noah 
        Subject:        Re: P3P and XML Schemas

"Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org> writes:

> Sorry, my original mail had one of the addresses wrong,
> I hope this is corrected now.

> [discussion elided]

> On the XML schema side, if it's currently not possible to express
> arbitrary order with occurrence constraints, that may be a problem
> independent of whether P3P needs it; I'm sure there are other uses
> where this is a requirement.

> At 00/04/04 22:12 +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote:

> >[other stuff]
> >
> >If what you want is arbitrary order, just what do you mean by that,
> >e.g. , is the following OK?
> >
> >  <extension>...</extension>
> >  <statement>...</statement>
> >  <disclosure>...</disclosure>
> >  <statement>...</statement>
> >  <extension>...</extension>
> >  <statement>...</statement>

The above question is pressing, if you want the WG to consider
"arbitrary order with occurrence constraints", we really need clear
input on this.

  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of 
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                     Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
                                      URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Monday, 10 April 2000 21:14:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:08:47 UTC