W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2000

3.4: {name} of the Ur-Type

From: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 04:16:55 -0400
Message-ID: <81A48CA1E953D211B11600A0C9E1C1B995B72D@mail.bowstreet.com>
To: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Why is the {name} of the Ur-Type (as a Complex Type) in 3.4 shown as "Not
specified"? How is this different from "absent"?

I assume that anonymous complex types in general have "absent" as their
{name} or is this not true?

James Tauber
Director XML Technology
Bowstreet www.bowstreet.com
Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 04:19:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:08:47 UTC