- From: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 04:16:55 -0400
- To: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Why is the {name} of the Ur-Type (as a Complex Type) in 3.4 shown as "Not
specified"? How is this different from "absent"?
I assume that anonymous complex types in general have "absent" as their
{name} or is this not true?
James
--
James Tauber
jtauber@bowstreet.com
Director XML Technology
Bowstreet www.bowstreet.com
Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 04:19:21 UTC