- From: Asir S Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 09:59:09 -0400
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
I am having a hard time to understand - how to evaluate 'The item type definition is validly derived from the {type definition}'. And, here is the text from the spec, http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#coss-ct <Snip> Constraint on Schemas: Type Derivation OK (Complex) A complex type definition (call it D, for derived) is validly derived from a type definition (call this B, for base) given a subset of {extension, restriction} if: 1.1 The {derivation method} of D is not in the subset, or in the {final} of its {base type definition}; 1.2 Either 1.2.1 They are the same type definition; or 1.2.2 B is the {base type definition} or 1.2.3 the {base type definition} is not the ur-type definition and is validly derived from B given the subset as defined by this constraint (if the {base type definition} is complex) or validly derived from B given the subset unioned with {list} as defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) (?5.12) (if the {base type definition} is simple). </Snip> Please help me understand (may be an example) & I greatly appreciate your help. All the best, Asir S Vedamuthu webMethods, Inc. (Phone) 703-460-2513 (Fax) 703-460-2513 (E-mail) asirv@webmethods.com URL: http://www.webmethods.com
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2000 09:57:48 UTC