- From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 19:41:36 -0800
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc: w3t-comm@w3.org
These are just a few minor editorial comments on your Last Call draft, XML Schema Part 1: Structures [1] "work in progress." Please feel free to ignore or use them as you see fit. In the interest of advancing schemas in practice, perhaps in the Abstract or in Introduction section 1, you could identify your audience, encourage them, and (like MathML) explain that this is not a user's guide for the general public. This specification is carefully and beautifully done, but it was a mystery for me on one reading, even after reading the Primer. Both Webster's (en-US) and the concise Oxford dictionaries list the "z" rather than the "s" form of these words first: normalisation, normalised, optimise, standardised, and characterisation. They could be changed to z's. The text does not refer to most of the References (Cambridge Communique, DCD, DDML, ISO-11404, and so on). I'm not certain they need to be there, especially the old URI RFCs. Though I didn't correct this here, apparently the use of "we" is frowned on in specifications. I don't yet have a proper reference for you. One reason is in the final paragraph of http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000JanMa r/0079.html which explains that first person English is hard to translate. muzmo.com and foo.com are registered domains. You could consider using example.com, example.net, and example.org which IANA registered for examples. (See RFC 2606 section 3 at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt.) Minor typos (quotes are followed by a suggestion) ----------- 2.2.1.3 par. 1 with respect to particular simple type with respect to a particular simple type 2.2.1.3 par. 2, list items 1 and 3 A restriction a restriction 3.4 table - {content type}, and 3.4 par. 11, and 3.13 par. 7 I.e i.e., 3.7 par. 3 {compositor}determines {compositor} determines 3.13 par. 11 . therein. . 4.3.3 table {content type} 4.4.2.3 the the the 5.1 list item 4 has a subheading 4 (that should perhaps be 4.1 or 1). In 5.11, the first sentence is repeated in the third line 5.11 note in 1.1.6 It is trivially It is trivial 6.3.1 par. 1 mime MIME 6.3.2 list item 2 note, and 6.3.2 last par. recommendation Recommendation B. line 3 The the The B. line 172 exculsive exclusive D. HTML 4.0 Specification HTML 4.01 Specification RFC 1808,Relative RFC 1808, Relative RFC 1738,Uniform RFC 1738, Uniform RFC 2141,URN RFC 2141, URN XSchema c/xscspecv4.htm For more c/xscspecv4.htm. For more [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xmlschema-1-20000407/ Best wishes for your project, -- Susan Lesch Intern, W3C
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2000 22:41:44 UTC