- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 02 Jun 2000 14:43:15 +0100
- To: S_PERROTT <Simon.Perrott@reuters.com>
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
S_PERROTT <Simon.Perrott@reuters.com> writes: > 1) Root elements. > I understand that a schema can have several global elements of > complexType. Is there any way for a schema to indicate which of its > elements will be the root element in instance documents? (The way > that the DTD !DOCTYPE declaration does). If not how can you tell > what starts off an instance? Just as in XML 1.0 this is an issue not for DTDs as such (the identity of the document element is not specified in either internal or external subset) we decided that it's not a matter for schemas as such. Also, again as in XML 1.0, one can specify external to the schema, in the invocation of schema processing, a top-level element declaration or type to begin validation with. This fulfills the specified requirement. > 2) Association of a schema to an instance. > I am confused about the relationship between schemas and > namespaces. An instance document may declare several namespaces in > its root element. I understand this to mean that the instance uses > components in several schemas whose target namespaces are referenced > in the instance. But is there a notion that the instance is based > on one schema that itself uses parts of other schemas? If so, how > can you tell which of the namespaces in an instance contains this > schema upon which the instance is mostly based? The distinction between schemas (abstract types, composed of schema components, some perhaps with different target namespaces than others) and schema documents (concrete XML documents, single target namespace, may refer to components from schemas corresponding to schema documents with other target namespaces. Consider the two-namespace case: at least three possibilities arise: 1) Two schema documents, one for each namespace, no <import>s at all, judicious use of <any/>, the instance (or the schema-validator) must locate both schema documents to construct the schema which can do the validation; 2) Two schema documents, one for each namespace, one <import>s the other and makes explicit reference to components from it, the instance (or the schema-validator) may locate first the <import>ing and then, thereby, the <import>ed; 3) Two schema documents, one for each namespace, each <import>s the other and each makes explicit reference to components from the other, the instance (or the schema-validator) may locate first one and then, thereby, the other. > 3) maxOccurs > Quoting from the definition of maxOccurs: "{max occurs} unbounded, > if the maxOccurs [attribute] equals unbounded, otherwise the numeric > lexical [value] of the maxOccurs [attribute], if present, otherwise > the lexical [value] of the minOccurs [attribute], if present, > otherwise 1. " > Section 2.2 of the primer states this as "there is no default value for > maxOccurs per se: When an element is declared without a maxOccurs attribute, > the maximum number of the element's occurrences is equal to the value of the > minOccurs attribute." Known bug, will be corrected in Part 1 to 'if present and non-zero' and brought in to line in Part 0. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Friday, 2 June 2000 09:43:32 UTC