- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 29 Jun 2000 16:21:59 +0100
- To: "DuCharme, Robert" <Robert.DuCharme@moodys.com>
- Cc: "'Biron,Paul V'" <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>, "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
"DuCharme, Robert" <Robert.DuCharme@moodys.com> writes: > I understand. I was just curious if the issue of a parser's required > behavior with NMTOKEN elements had been addressed--that is, if assigning an > element a type of NMTOKEN (as an example in section 4.3.3 of Part 1 of the > schema spec does) would actually buy you anything. We have an pending issue to consider what aspects, if any, of attribute value normalisation to import into XML Schema processing, and when we do we need to consider whether whatever we do for attribute values we will also do for element content. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Thursday, 29 June 2000 11:22:13 UTC