- From: Mabry, F. DR EECS <df6954@exmail.usma.army.mil>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 10:36:21 -0400
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
In my earlier comments I had included a comment about the inclusion of a positional data representation. Clearly my employment by the Department of the Army raises my personal interest in seeing the specification address this point considerably. I believe that as GPS technology permeates our lives (not just your car will "know" its location, your cell phone, PDA, maybe even your car keys(?!) will both know their location and perhaps report it) we will need to address the representation of positional data. I think giving careful consideration to the inclusion of such a representational form now is as important as the debate over time duration and E notation. Please note: most positional notation forms can be converted to other positional forms. Knowledge of the required/default/assumed precision of positional value is also important. Certainly, comparisons of positional values is not a simple matter (X=Y is often a question X=Y +/- (min or max of) positional precision of each value). Consider also such relations as "northof(X,Y)" or "near(X,Y[, +/-epsilon ]). I am not suggesting such functions be supported in the schema representation, but the potential to represent such data and its required/default/assumed precision will eventually benefit everyone. Frank Dr. Frank Mabry Dept. of EE&CS, U.S. Military Academy West Point, NY 10996 email: df6954@eecs1.eecs.usma.edu Phone: (914) 938-2960
Received on Friday, 2 June 2000 10:36:13 UTC