- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 20 Apr 2000 17:25:06 +0100
- To: "Box, Don" <dbox@develop.com>
- Cc: "'Arnold, Curt'" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>, "'xml-dev@xml.org'" <xml-dev@xml.org>, "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>, "'xml-dev-temp@egroups.com'" <xml-dev-temp@egroups.com>
"Box, Don" <dbox@develop.com> writes: > Yeah, I thought about alternative ways to model that. One way would have > been to use a named model group (that was my first pass btw). The problem is > that for mixed content, you can't use sequence constraints. This is a > problem with older technologies as well. Yes you can -- the whole point of making 'mixed' orthogonal to the content model is that e.g. <xs:complexType name='haystack' content='mixed'> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name='thread'/> <xs:element name='needle'/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> schema-validates _only_ <haystack> elements with exactly one <thread> and one <needle> daughters, _in that order_. Yet another reason to think again about the default <choice> wrapper when you simply say <xs:complexType content='mixed'> <xs:element .../> . . . </xs:complexType> ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2000 12:25:25 UTC