- From: Vun Kannon, David <dvunkannon@kpmg.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 11:53:02 -0400
- To: "'ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk'" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Got it. I'm also thinking about appinfo for what I've taken to calling my "#IMPLIED resolution strategy". I want my schema to state explicitly what to do if a particular attribute is absent from an instance of an element for which that attribute is declared. For instance, the strategy that most of my attributes follow is: ancestor-or-self::*[@implied-attribute][1]/@implied-attribute which means that the attribute must exist somewhere among the containing elements. Choosing the nearest value gives this useful behavior that the attribute can be given a default, then the default overridden for any subtree. Is this idea of "absent attribute resolution strategy" useful enough to all schemas that it should be part of XSchema itself, as opposed to hiding it under the appinfo bushel? Thanks, David -----Original Message----- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 4:46 PM To: Vun Kannon, David Cc: 'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org' Subject: Re: Using appinfo annotations to store integrity constraints "Vun Kannon, David" <dvunkannon@kpmg.com> writes: > I am considering, as the subject line says, using appinfo > annotations to store integrity constraints. Consider a document as the > transfer syntax for a database predicate. An integrity constraint might be > "no worker earns more than their supervisor" or "pay_rate > 0". These > integrity constraints could be expressed as CHECK constraints in SQL, for > instance. That's exactly the sort of thing appinfo is designed for. Sorry the documentation is less complete in this area than it should be. As the schema for schemas reveals, the content model for appinfo is constrained only in so far as it may not contain elements from the XML Schema namespace itself -- anything else, in any combination, is fine. So declare a namespace at the top of your schema, and put whatever you like from that namespace inside appinfo. If you give your schema validator a schema for _that_ namespace as well as the schema for schemas, the contents of appinfo from that namespace will get schema-validated as well. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ ***************************************************************************** The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. *****************************************************************************
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2000 11:53:30 UTC