W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Resolution of QNames references

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 11 May 2000 10:26:34 +0100
To: "Curt Arnold" <carnold@houston.rr.com>
Cc: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5b3dnpo2t1.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
"Curt Arnold" <carnold@houston.rr.com> writes:

> Section 6.2.2: References to schema components across namespaces

> The comments in the example are the only place that I have found that
> indicate how unqualified QName references are to be resolved.   From a
> usability standpoint, it would be much preferable to that an unqualified
> name be first attempted to be located within the target namespace then with
> the datatypes (or schema namespace).  This, of course, would be a more
> complex resolution than would be used for a unqualified tagname but seems to
> be consistent with previous usage.

They wouldn't be QNames in the meaning of the word if we did it that
way.  We didn't think it wise to invent a new concept

  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Thursday, 11 May 2000 05:26:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:08:47 UTC