- From: Nik Klever <nik.klever@bitoek.uni-bayreuth.de>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:11:26 +0200
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- CC: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
"Henry S. Thompson" writes: > > Nik Klever <nik.klever@bitoek.uni-bayreuth.de> writes: > > > I would suggest the following changes to the topics of Element Equivalence Class: > > > > 1) rename equivClass to equivElement > > > > 2) introduce another attribut equivClass which should be used to summarize > > the equivalent Elements of one class, e.g. of one language. > > > <snip/> > > Thanks for the suggestion: we're discussing renaming equivalence > classes right now in the WG, so your input is timely. However, I'm > not clear on you proposal what would appear in content models to > enforce the appearance of synchronised members of an equivClass. I'm not sure, whether I understand this clearly: is it necessary to enforce the appearance of synchronized members of an equivClass ? if the equivClass is not available for some elements, a default must be declared which could be used instead - or did I understand something wrong ? Nik mailto:nik.klever@bitoek.uni-bayreuth.de http://www.bitoek.uni-bayreuth.de/~nik
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2000 13:05:29 UTC