W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Note on DTD-related questions

From: <muraw3c@attglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:59:14 +0900 (JST)
To: w3c-xml-schema-ig@w3.org, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc: Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com>
Message-Id: <20000620005914W.muraw3c@attglobal.net>
Dan wrote:
>MURATA Makoto wrote:
snip
>> I had a look at your www site, but have not been able find an example of
>> schemata containing more than one vocabulary.  What is the schema for
>> your example "xhtml-mathml-ex.html"?
>
>There are two namespaces, and two schema documents:
>	http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/04schema-hacking/html-renamed
>	http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/04schema-hacking/mathml-renamed
>
>The schema I intend to use to validate xhtml-mathml-ex.html
>is the union of the schema components represented in those
>two schema documents.

I very much would like to see "the union", since I have no ideas 
about it.  I strongly doubt that XML Schema is simply unable to 
capture it thus failing to provide a basis for the XHTML family. 

> [... no comment on the good question about requirements just now...]

In my understanding, you are updating the requirement document.  
It would be very nice if (1) the updated requirement document states 
this issue, (2) the HTML WG agrees on your description of the issue, 
and (3) your example (and "the union") is published as a solution.

MURATA Makoto
Received on Monday, 19 June 2000 11:58:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:08:47 UTC