Todo list (was: sgml-lib/REC-xhtml1-20000126/xhtml1-transitional.dtd)
automated queries
information
The Validator page is invalid!
new html pages for validator
outlines no shown (?)
Small bug with latest version of (X)HTML validator
couldn't validate because first line
Re: Validator changes: 0_6_0 or HEAD?
typo in validation page
Wrong error defn: P containing DIV
Question on "target"
Config::General 2.06
Link to tidy on-line?
"SGML Parser" should be checked sooner
charset x-sjis not supported by validator
validator w3 org bug, unable to detect doctype while provided
- RE: validator w3 org bug, unable to detect doctype while provided
- Re: validator w3 org bug, unable to detect doctype while provided
link from Valid XHTML 1.0! button
http://validator.w3.org/favlets.html
Nov 26 2002 update possible error
Can we have the "type" and "encoding" options back?
- Re: Can we have the "type" and "encoding" options back?
URI Handling Bug With W3C HTML Validator
your new pages - possible problem with Opera
Server Software
Opinion/Question
Comments on New Validation Service
[ANN] New generation of the "Markup Validator" released
[administrativia] change of anti-spam system for this list
Fwd : Link rot in http://validator.w3.org/source/
checklink: no upload file support?
[ANNOUNCE] OpenSP 1.5 Released
<link /> confuses the validator
css and valid css
Weird file name side effect in validating.
Re: Beta: pre in place of code for icon code
Re: Beta: outline feature broken
How to do valid UL's in Tables?
Some quick ideas
Re: Parse tree error for css validator
Feature Request: missing xmlns, attribute value parsing
[ANN] Bug-tracking service for validator(s) now available
[ANN] W3C MarkUp Validator Beta 3 Released!
checklink: very nice
outsider question: inconsistent beta validation
uploaded file in beta validator
Minor error in xhtml validator GUI
patch procdure
Ampersands (&'s) in URLs...
validator missing an error
http://validator.w3.org/check/?uri=http%3A//www.asx.com.au/asx/homepage/index.jsp
The beta validator
[Beta] Error Message
SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation.
- Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation.
- Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation.
example of error that validator misses.
Why does it say ALL images need alt tags?
- RE: Why does it say ALL images need alt tags?
- Re: Why does it say ALL images need alt tags?
- Re: Why does it say ALL images need alt tags?
- Re: Why does it say ALL images need alt tags?
No Character Encoding detected! But Why?
Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
oh where, or where, has my weblint gone?
Re: Bug: DOCTYPE upeercase vs. lowercase
xhtml and lang=en identifier
Suggestion concerning SP limitations
Error: element "form" not allowed here. Need some assistance!
Bug?
checklink:
defective HTML401 icon
application/xhtml+xml not supported by validator
help for framespacing attribut
Beta [RFE]: the validator should take into account Mime-type discrepancies
- Re: Beta [RFE]: the validator should take into account Mime-type discrepancies
- Re: Beta [RFE]: the validator should take into account Mime-type discrepancies
Beta: "Revalidate" doesn't work for files
- Re: Beta: "Revalidate" doesn't work for files
- Re: Beta: "Revalidate" doesn't work for files
- Re: Beta: "Revalidate" doesn't work for files
- Re: Beta: "Revalidate" doesn't work for files
Validation of long-lines with non ASCII characters
Validation and file upload wierdness
Debug option in configuration file broken ?
Re: Frame validation
image dysfunction
Validator in error?
Beta: Character escapes in system identifiers
Beta: White-space in public identifier
Re: bug in checklink
Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema
Re: Two suggestions
Re: detailed.html page broken in CVS
Beta: checklink limit to domain
Beta: broken link to tarball
Beta: Invalid docs
Beta: application/xhtml+xml vs. HTML documents
Beta: Valid HTML 2.0 icon
Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!
- Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!
- Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!
- Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!
- Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!