- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:05:37 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Matthias Englert <Matthias.Englert@gmx.de>
- cc: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>, W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Matthias Englert wrote: > > The output options are there so that people can begin to experiment with > > integrating the Validator in their workflows -- CMSs or blogs etc. -- but > > if you integrate it in a production environment you'd best be prepared for > > it to break. > > > That's ok as long as I can detected that it's broken (should be no > problem by parsing the version information and check for a 200 OK). Sounds as if you're fine with the experimental options. If you want a guaranteed stable XML or EARL validation service, I can offer you that from Site Valet. But a guaranteed-stable format would be a commercial option (though these options in Page Valet have in practice been fully stable for more than a year now). -- Nick Kew
Received on Saturday, 30 November 2002 18:05:41 UTC