- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:26:43 +0100
- To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
- cc: Craig Macbride <craigm@ragingbull.com>, KlausRusch@atmedia.net
Klaus Johannes Rusch <KlausRusch@atmedia.net> wrote: >Craig Macbride wrote: >>The fact that some people are used to the misspelling is irrelevant. >>Most people who use your web site don't need to use HTTP specs directly >>and may never even know about the misspelling. Someone unaware of the >>HTTP mistake and just seeing your URL on links would think you're >>idiots. I suspect that attitude is allready well established. :-) >>How hard would it be to have a URL to the correct spelling as well as >>the incorrect one? > >Allowing both spellings IMHO would make sense, only using /referrer >would not. Ok, the alternate spelling is now also recognized (changed in will be in the next version), but we still use /referer in the text. -- "Frailty, thy name is woman!" - Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. See Project Gutenberg <URL:http://promo.net/pg/> for more.
Received on Saturday, 2 November 2002 12:26:59 UTC