- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 17:57:05 +0100
- To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi> wrote: >On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 20:03, Terje Bless wrote: > >>>Anyway, I found the "Note: The HTTP Content-Type field did not contain >>>a "charset" attribute ..." confusing in the context. Could it be >>>worded differently? >> >>Probably. Can you suggest something that would have made more sense to >>you? > >Here's mine (note the s/field/header/ too): > >For the upload case: > >"Note: The HTTP Content-Type header sent by your user agent >[maybe-the-User-Agent-header-here] did not contain ..." > >For the "normal" case: > >"Note: The HTTP Content-Type header sent by the server >[maybe-the-Server-header-here] did not contain ..." Mostly this was allready changed due to feedback from Chris Lilley, but I've tweaked it further to bring it in line with your suggestion. -- "Temper Temper! Mr. Dre? Mr. NWA? Mr. AK, comin´ straight outta Compton and y'all better make way?" -- eminem
Received on Sunday, 3 November 2002 11:57:09 UTC